评估信息可视化工具的策略:多维深入的长期案例研究

B. Shneiderman, C. Plaisant
{"title":"评估信息可视化工具的策略:多维深入的长期案例研究","authors":"B. Shneiderman, C. Plaisant","doi":"10.1145/1168149.1168158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After an historical review of evaluation methods, we describe an emerging research method called Multi-dimensional In-depth Long-term Case studies (MILCs) which seems well adapted to study the creative activities that users of information visualization systems engage in. We propose that the efficacy of tools can be assessed by documenting 1) usage (observations, interviews, surveys, logging etc.) and 2) expert users' success in achieving their professional goals. We summarize lessons from related ethnography methods used in HCI and provide guidelines for conducting MILCs for information visualization. We suggest ways to refine the methods for MILCs in modest sized projects and then envision ambitious projects with 3-10 researchers working over 1-3 years to understand individual and organizational use of information visualization by domain experts working at the frontiers of knowledge in their fields.","PeriodicalId":235801,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"484","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools: multi-dimensional in-depth long-term case studies\",\"authors\":\"B. Shneiderman, C. Plaisant\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1168149.1168158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After an historical review of evaluation methods, we describe an emerging research method called Multi-dimensional In-depth Long-term Case studies (MILCs) which seems well adapted to study the creative activities that users of information visualization systems engage in. We propose that the efficacy of tools can be assessed by documenting 1) usage (observations, interviews, surveys, logging etc.) and 2) expert users' success in achieving their professional goals. We summarize lessons from related ethnography methods used in HCI and provide guidelines for conducting MILCs for information visualization. We suggest ways to refine the methods for MILCs in modest sized projects and then envision ambitious projects with 3-10 researchers working over 1-3 years to understand individual and organizational use of information visualization by domain experts working at the frontiers of knowledge in their fields.\",\"PeriodicalId\":235801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"484\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1168149.1168158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1168149.1168158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 484

摘要

在对评估方法的历史回顾之后,我们描述了一种新兴的研究方法,称为多维深度长期案例研究(milc),它似乎很适合研究信息可视化系统用户参与的创造性活动。我们建议工具的有效性可以通过记录1)使用情况(观察、访谈、调查、记录等)和2)专家用户在实现其专业目标方面的成功来评估。我们总结了在HCI中使用的相关人种学方法的经验教训,并提供了用于信息可视化的milc的指导方针。我们建议在中等规模的项目中改进milc的方法,然后设想有3-10名研究人员工作1-3年的雄心勃勃的项目,以了解在各自领域知识前沿工作的领域专家对信息可视化的个人和组织使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools: multi-dimensional in-depth long-term case studies
After an historical review of evaluation methods, we describe an emerging research method called Multi-dimensional In-depth Long-term Case studies (MILCs) which seems well adapted to study the creative activities that users of information visualization systems engage in. We propose that the efficacy of tools can be assessed by documenting 1) usage (observations, interviews, surveys, logging etc.) and 2) expert users' success in achieving their professional goals. We summarize lessons from related ethnography methods used in HCI and provide guidelines for conducting MILCs for information visualization. We suggest ways to refine the methods for MILCs in modest sized projects and then envision ambitious projects with 3-10 researchers working over 1-3 years to understand individual and organizational use of information visualization by domain experts working at the frontiers of knowledge in their fields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信