对TripAdvisor上的旅游评论进行评价以保护世界遗产地:文本挖掘方法

Akın Özen
{"title":"对TripAdvisor上的旅游评论进行评价以保护世界遗产地:文本挖掘方法","authors":"Akın Özen","doi":"10.31822/JOMAT.876175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collecting and analyzing online tourist reviews on destinations is important for sustainable tourism. These analyses can give insight into the extent to which natural and cultural assets in the destination are protected. These evaluations should be considered by the authorities as objective and realistic assessments. In this study, 4183 TripAdvisor reviews of foreign tourists visiting “Goreme National Park and Cappadocia Rocky Area”, which is listed in the World Heritage Site, were evaluated. The data set consisted of English reviews of foreign tourists visiting the region between the years of 2018 - 2020. Dictionary-based sentiment analysis, one of the text mining methods, was used in the study. According to the analysis results, the positive perceptions of the tourists about the churches, fairy chimneys, valleys and underground cities in the World Heritage Site were found to be significantly high (75%). Negative evaluations were found to be low (33%). In tourist reviews, 63% positive and 10.49% negative evaluations were made about the protection of the region. In addition, the awareness of the tourists about whether the locations they visit are World Heritage Sites was 30.6%. Tourists explained their negative opinions about the locations they visited with the words \"extra_payment\", \"crowded\", and \"steep\". Another finding of the study was that the area is adequately protected. There were, however, some concerns related to protection. The most striking aspects of protection concerns were those in which the words \"painted\" and \"drawn\" were used, an important indicator of visitor sensitivity to the protection of frescoes in rock churches. Since the destruction of natural and cultural assets in the region is unacceptable, recommendations are made to take the necessary measures to prevent such damage.","PeriodicalId":164778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Tourism","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of tourist reviews on TripAdvisor for the protection of the world heritage sites: Text mining approach\",\"authors\":\"Akın Özen\",\"doi\":\"10.31822/JOMAT.876175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Collecting and analyzing online tourist reviews on destinations is important for sustainable tourism. These analyses can give insight into the extent to which natural and cultural assets in the destination are protected. These evaluations should be considered by the authorities as objective and realistic assessments. In this study, 4183 TripAdvisor reviews of foreign tourists visiting “Goreme National Park and Cappadocia Rocky Area”, which is listed in the World Heritage Site, were evaluated. The data set consisted of English reviews of foreign tourists visiting the region between the years of 2018 - 2020. Dictionary-based sentiment analysis, one of the text mining methods, was used in the study. According to the analysis results, the positive perceptions of the tourists about the churches, fairy chimneys, valleys and underground cities in the World Heritage Site were found to be significantly high (75%). Negative evaluations were found to be low (33%). In tourist reviews, 63% positive and 10.49% negative evaluations were made about the protection of the region. In addition, the awareness of the tourists about whether the locations they visit are World Heritage Sites was 30.6%. Tourists explained their negative opinions about the locations they visited with the words \\\"extra_payment\\\", \\\"crowded\\\", and \\\"steep\\\". Another finding of the study was that the area is adequately protected. There were, however, some concerns related to protection. The most striking aspects of protection concerns were those in which the words \\\"painted\\\" and \\\"drawn\\\" were used, an important indicator of visitor sensitivity to the protection of frescoes in rock churches. Since the destruction of natural and cultural assets in the region is unacceptable, recommendations are made to take the necessary measures to prevent such damage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Tourism\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Tourism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31822/JOMAT.876175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Tourism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31822/JOMAT.876175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

收集和分析在线游客对目的地的评论对可持续旅游很重要。这些分析可以深入了解目的地的自然和文化资产受到保护的程度。当局应将这些评价视为客观和现实的评价。在本研究中,我们对4183条外国游客在TripAdvisor上对被列入世界遗产的“戈雷姆国家公园和卡帕多西亚洛基地区”的旅游评论进行了评价。该数据集包括2018年至2020年期间访问该地区的外国游客的英语评论。基于词典的情感分析是一种文本挖掘方法。根据分析结果,游客对世界遗产地的教堂、仙女烟囱、山谷和地下城的正面观感明显较高(75%)。负面评价较低(33%)。在游客评论中,63%的人对该地区的保护做出了正面评价,10.49%的人对该地区的保护做出了负面评价。此外,30.6%的游客知道他们参观的地点是否是世界遗产。游客们用“收费过高”、“拥挤”和“陡峭”等词来解释他们对旅游地点的负面评价。该研究的另一个发现是该地区得到了充分的保护。但是,有一些关于保护的关切。保护问题最引人注目的方面是那些使用“绘画”和“绘制”字样的地方,这是游客对岩石教堂壁画保护敏感的一个重要指标。由于破坏该区域的自然和文化资产是不可接受的,因此建议采取必要措施防止这种破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of tourist reviews on TripAdvisor for the protection of the world heritage sites: Text mining approach
Collecting and analyzing online tourist reviews on destinations is important for sustainable tourism. These analyses can give insight into the extent to which natural and cultural assets in the destination are protected. These evaluations should be considered by the authorities as objective and realistic assessments. In this study, 4183 TripAdvisor reviews of foreign tourists visiting “Goreme National Park and Cappadocia Rocky Area”, which is listed in the World Heritage Site, were evaluated. The data set consisted of English reviews of foreign tourists visiting the region between the years of 2018 - 2020. Dictionary-based sentiment analysis, one of the text mining methods, was used in the study. According to the analysis results, the positive perceptions of the tourists about the churches, fairy chimneys, valleys and underground cities in the World Heritage Site were found to be significantly high (75%). Negative evaluations were found to be low (33%). In tourist reviews, 63% positive and 10.49% negative evaluations were made about the protection of the region. In addition, the awareness of the tourists about whether the locations they visit are World Heritage Sites was 30.6%. Tourists explained their negative opinions about the locations they visited with the words "extra_payment", "crowded", and "steep". Another finding of the study was that the area is adequately protected. There were, however, some concerns related to protection. The most striking aspects of protection concerns were those in which the words "painted" and "drawn" were used, an important indicator of visitor sensitivity to the protection of frescoes in rock churches. Since the destruction of natural and cultural assets in the region is unacceptable, recommendations are made to take the necessary measures to prevent such damage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信