内部市场中的不公正行为。论欧洲私法在欧盟、成员国及其公民之间道德责任划分中的作用

M. Hesselink
{"title":"内部市场中的不公正行为。论欧洲私法在欧盟、成员国及其公民之间道德责任划分中的作用","authors":"M. Hesselink","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2532375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that the EU can be held morally responsible for ensuring justice in the internal market. In particular, the EU must prevent and sanction unjust market conduct by private parties through appropriate private law rules and ensure at least minimal protection of the private rights of internal market agents. The EU’s moral responsibility for maintaining justice in the internal market requires an EU discourse of civil justice going well beyond (and at times against) the European Commission’s slogan of ‘justice for growth’. The article first discusses and rejects three potential challenges to its main claim, all of which are based on different alleged divisions of labour, as a result of which it would seem to follow that European private law has no role to play in assuring distributive and interpersonal justice in the internal market. It then outlines how we might arrive at a conception of unjust conduct in the internal market that is compatible with the value pluralism that characterises Europe today. Finally, it explains why the private law acquis, because of the way it is currently constituted, is unlikely already to be in compliance with such standards of civil justice in the internal market.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unjust Conduct in the Internal Market. On the Role of European Private Law in the Division of Moral Responsibility between the EU, Its Member States and Their Citizens\",\"authors\":\"M. Hesselink\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2532375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper argues that the EU can be held morally responsible for ensuring justice in the internal market. In particular, the EU must prevent and sanction unjust market conduct by private parties through appropriate private law rules and ensure at least minimal protection of the private rights of internal market agents. The EU’s moral responsibility for maintaining justice in the internal market requires an EU discourse of civil justice going well beyond (and at times against) the European Commission’s slogan of ‘justice for growth’. The article first discusses and rejects three potential challenges to its main claim, all of which are based on different alleged divisions of labour, as a result of which it would seem to follow that European private law has no role to play in assuring distributive and interpersonal justice in the internal market. It then outlines how we might arrive at a conception of unjust conduct in the internal market that is compatible with the value pluralism that characterises Europe today. Finally, it explains why the private law acquis, because of the way it is currently constituted, is unlikely already to be in compliance with such standards of civil justice in the internal market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2532375\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2532375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文认为,欧盟在确保内部市场的公正方面负有道义责任。特别是,欧盟必须通过适当的私法规则防止和制裁私人当事人的不公正市场行为,并确保至少对内部市场代理人的私人权利给予最低限度的保护。欧盟维护内部市场正义的道德责任要求欧盟的民事正义话语远远超出(有时是反对)欧盟委员会的“正义促进增长”的口号。文章首先讨论并拒绝了对其主要主张的三个潜在挑战,所有这些挑战都基于不同的所谓劳动分工,因此似乎可以得出结论,欧洲私法在确保内部市场的分配和人际正义方面没有发挥作用。然后,它概述了我们如何才能得出一种内部市场中不公正行为的概念,这种概念与当今欧洲的价值多元化相容。最后,它解释了为什么私法所得,由于其目前的构成方式,不太可能已经符合内部市场的民事司法标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unjust Conduct in the Internal Market. On the Role of European Private Law in the Division of Moral Responsibility between the EU, Its Member States and Their Citizens
This paper argues that the EU can be held morally responsible for ensuring justice in the internal market. In particular, the EU must prevent and sanction unjust market conduct by private parties through appropriate private law rules and ensure at least minimal protection of the private rights of internal market agents. The EU’s moral responsibility for maintaining justice in the internal market requires an EU discourse of civil justice going well beyond (and at times against) the European Commission’s slogan of ‘justice for growth’. The article first discusses and rejects three potential challenges to its main claim, all of which are based on different alleged divisions of labour, as a result of which it would seem to follow that European private law has no role to play in assuring distributive and interpersonal justice in the internal market. It then outlines how we might arrive at a conception of unjust conduct in the internal market that is compatible with the value pluralism that characterises Europe today. Finally, it explains why the private law acquis, because of the way it is currently constituted, is unlikely already to be in compliance with such standards of civil justice in the internal market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信