《物权法》和《知识产权议程

M. Grynberg
{"title":"《物权法》和《知识产权议程","authors":"M. Grynberg","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198826743.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What can intellectual property (IP) learn from the questions raised by property doctrine? A lot of scholarship addresses the degree to which the two bodies of law cohere in principle, justification, or practice. This chapter surveys some of this well-marked terrain, while suggesting some less detailed areas of the map that might merit more exploration than they have received to date. The most familiar set of questions arise from the contention that IP is or should be considered a form of property, but property law is also a source of doctrines and approaches for limiting the scope of intellectual property rights. Though less emphasized, a concern with information also links the two fields, as many property doctrines may also be considered a form of information management. Finally, conceiving of property doctrine as a system offers another possibility for informing IP scholarship.","PeriodicalId":440385,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of Intellectual Property Research","volume":"221 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Property Law and the Intellectual Property Agenda\",\"authors\":\"M. Grynberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198826743.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What can intellectual property (IP) learn from the questions raised by property doctrine? A lot of scholarship addresses the degree to which the two bodies of law cohere in principle, justification, or practice. This chapter surveys some of this well-marked terrain, while suggesting some less detailed areas of the map that might merit more exploration than they have received to date. The most familiar set of questions arise from the contention that IP is or should be considered a form of property, but property law is also a source of doctrines and approaches for limiting the scope of intellectual property rights. Though less emphasized, a concern with information also links the two fields, as many property doctrines may also be considered a form of information management. Finally, conceiving of property doctrine as a system offers another possibility for informing IP scholarship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Handbook of Intellectual Property Research\",\"volume\":\"221 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Handbook of Intellectual Property Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198826743.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of Intellectual Property Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198826743.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

知识产权能从产权原则提出的问题中学到什么?许多学术研究关注的是这两个法律体系在原则、理由或实践上的一致程度。本章考察了一些标记明确的地形,同时提出了地图上一些不太详细的区域,这些区域可能值得进行更多的探索。最熟悉的一系列问题源于知识产权是或应该被视为一种财产形式的争论,但物权法也是限制知识产权范围的理论和方法的来源。虽然较少强调,但对信息的关注也将这两个领域联系起来,因为许多财产理论也可以被视为信息管理的一种形式。最后,将财产原则构想为一个系统,为知识产权研究提供了另一种可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Property Law and the Intellectual Property Agenda
What can intellectual property (IP) learn from the questions raised by property doctrine? A lot of scholarship addresses the degree to which the two bodies of law cohere in principle, justification, or practice. This chapter surveys some of this well-marked terrain, while suggesting some less detailed areas of the map that might merit more exploration than they have received to date. The most familiar set of questions arise from the contention that IP is or should be considered a form of property, but property law is also a source of doctrines and approaches for limiting the scope of intellectual property rights. Though less emphasized, a concern with information also links the two fields, as many property doctrines may also be considered a form of information management. Finally, conceiving of property doctrine as a system offers another possibility for informing IP scholarship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信