基于udp的高速传输协议性能评价

Zhaojuan Yue, Yongmao Ren, Jun Li
{"title":"基于udp的高速传输协议性能评价","authors":"Zhaojuan Yue, Yongmao Ren, Jun Li","doi":"10.1109/ICSESS.2011.5982257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of high speed long distance networks has promoted the development of various e-science applications. The traditional TCP protocol is not suitable for high bandwidth-delay product networks because of its conservative Additive Increase Multiplicative Decrease (AIMD) congestion control algorithm and slow start strategy. This paper mainly introduces four kinds of typical UDP-based high speed transport protocols (RUBDP, Tsunami, UDT, and PA-UDP). By experiments on the test bed with end-to-end transport mode, the influence of the file size, loss ratio and RTT to the performance of the four protocols is evaluated. And, the intra-protocol fairness and inter-protocol fairness while transferring multiple parallel flows are also evaluated. The results show: PA-UDP protocol has the best transport performance; UDT protocol is the most convenient, because it does not require the users to set the initial sending rate, buffer size and other parameters.","PeriodicalId":108533,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of UDP-based high-speed transport protocols\",\"authors\":\"Zhaojuan Yue, Yongmao Ren, Jun Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSESS.2011.5982257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The emergence of high speed long distance networks has promoted the development of various e-science applications. The traditional TCP protocol is not suitable for high bandwidth-delay product networks because of its conservative Additive Increase Multiplicative Decrease (AIMD) congestion control algorithm and slow start strategy. This paper mainly introduces four kinds of typical UDP-based high speed transport protocols (RUBDP, Tsunami, UDT, and PA-UDP). By experiments on the test bed with end-to-end transport mode, the influence of the file size, loss ratio and RTT to the performance of the four protocols is evaluated. And, the intra-protocol fairness and inter-protocol fairness while transferring multiple parallel flows are also evaluated. The results show: PA-UDP protocol has the best transport performance; UDT protocol is the most convenient, because it does not require the users to set the initial sending rate, buffer size and other parameters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSESS.2011.5982257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSESS.2011.5982257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

高速长途网络的出现促进了各种电子科学应用的发展。传统的TCP协议由于其保守的AIMD (Additive Increase multiplative reduction)拥塞控制算法和慢启动策略而不适用于高带宽延迟的产品网络。本文主要介绍了四种典型的基于udp的高速传输协议(RUBDP、Tsunami、UDT和PA-UDP)。通过端到端传输模式的实验平台,评估了文件大小、丢包率和RTT对四种协议性能的影响。并对传输多个并行流时的协议内公平性和协议间公平性进行了评价。结果表明:PA-UDP协议具有最佳的传输性能;UDT协议是最方便的,因为它不需要用户设置初始发送速率、缓冲区大小等参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance evaluation of UDP-based high-speed transport protocols
The emergence of high speed long distance networks has promoted the development of various e-science applications. The traditional TCP protocol is not suitable for high bandwidth-delay product networks because of its conservative Additive Increase Multiplicative Decrease (AIMD) congestion control algorithm and slow start strategy. This paper mainly introduces four kinds of typical UDP-based high speed transport protocols (RUBDP, Tsunami, UDT, and PA-UDP). By experiments on the test bed with end-to-end transport mode, the influence of the file size, loss ratio and RTT to the performance of the four protocols is evaluated. And, the intra-protocol fairness and inter-protocol fairness while transferring multiple parallel flows are also evaluated. The results show: PA-UDP protocol has the best transport performance; UDT protocol is the most convenient, because it does not require the users to set the initial sending rate, buffer size and other parameters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信