通过可解释的人工智能增强仇恨言论检测

D. Mittal, Harmeet Singh
{"title":"通过可解释的人工智能增强仇恨言论检测","authors":"D. Mittal, Harmeet Singh","doi":"10.1109/ICSMDI57622.2023.00028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The potential of XAI in detecting hate speech using deep learning models is versatile and multifaceted. To better understand the decision-making process of complex AI models, this study applied XAI to the dataset and investigated the interpretability and explanation of their decisions. The data was preprocessed by cleaning, tokenizing, lemmatizing, and removing inconsistencies in tweets. Simplification of categorical variables was also performed during training. Exploratory data analysis was conducted to identify patterns and insights in the dataset. The study used a set of existing models, including LIME, SHAP, XGBoost, and KTrain, to analyze the accuracy. The KTrain model achieved the highest accuracy and lowest loss among the variants developed to increase explainability.","PeriodicalId":373017,"journal":{"name":"2023 3rd International Conference on Smart Data Intelligence (ICSMDI)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Hate Speech Detection through Explainable AI\",\"authors\":\"D. Mittal, Harmeet Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSMDI57622.2023.00028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The potential of XAI in detecting hate speech using deep learning models is versatile and multifaceted. To better understand the decision-making process of complex AI models, this study applied XAI to the dataset and investigated the interpretability and explanation of their decisions. The data was preprocessed by cleaning, tokenizing, lemmatizing, and removing inconsistencies in tweets. Simplification of categorical variables was also performed during training. Exploratory data analysis was conducted to identify patterns and insights in the dataset. The study used a set of existing models, including LIME, SHAP, XGBoost, and KTrain, to analyze the accuracy. The KTrain model achieved the highest accuracy and lowest loss among the variants developed to increase explainability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":373017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 3rd International Conference on Smart Data Intelligence (ICSMDI)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 3rd International Conference on Smart Data Intelligence (ICSMDI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMDI57622.2023.00028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 3rd International Conference on Smart Data Intelligence (ICSMDI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMDI57622.2023.00028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

XAI在使用深度学习模型检测仇恨言论方面的潜力是多方面的。为了更好地理解复杂人工智能模型的决策过程,本研究将XAI应用于数据集,并研究其决策的可解释性和可解释性。数据通过清理、标记化、归纳化和删除tweet中的不一致进行预处理。分类变量的简化也在训练过程中进行。进行探索性数据分析,以确定数据集中的模式和见解。本研究使用了一组现有的模型,包括LIME、SHAP、XGBoost和KTrain,来分析准确性。在为提高可解释性而开发的变体中,KTrain模型实现了最高的准确性和最低的损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Hate Speech Detection through Explainable AI
The potential of XAI in detecting hate speech using deep learning models is versatile and multifaceted. To better understand the decision-making process of complex AI models, this study applied XAI to the dataset and investigated the interpretability and explanation of their decisions. The data was preprocessed by cleaning, tokenizing, lemmatizing, and removing inconsistencies in tweets. Simplification of categorical variables was also performed during training. Exploratory data analysis was conducted to identify patterns and insights in the dataset. The study used a set of existing models, including LIME, SHAP, XGBoost, and KTrain, to analyze the accuracy. The KTrain model achieved the highest accuracy and lowest loss among the variants developed to increase explainability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信