从脚跟和脚趾轨迹检测步态事件:使用多个数据集的方法比较

V. Guimarães, I. Sousa, M. Correia
{"title":"从脚跟和脚趾轨迹检测步态事件:使用多个数据集的方法比较","authors":"V. Guimarães, I. Sousa, M. Correia","doi":"10.1109/MeMeA52024.2021.9478606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reliable detection of gait events is important to ensure accurate assessment of gait. While it is usually performed resorting to force platforms, methods based uniquely on kinematic analysis have also been proposed. These methods place no restrictions on the number of steps that can be analysed, simplifying setup and complexity of assessments. They also replace the need of annotating events manually when force platforms are not available. Although few methods have been proposed in literature, validation studies are relatively scarce. In this study we present multiple methods for the detection of heel strike (HS) and toe off (TO) in normal walking, and validate the detection against annotated events using three different datasets. The best performing candidates are based on the evaluation of heel vertical velocity (for HS) and toe vertical acceleration (for TO), resulting in relative errors of -12.4 ± 32.9 ms for HS and of -15.5 ± 24.9 ms for TO. The method is compatible with barefoot and shod walking, constituting a convenient, fast and reliable alternative to automatic gait event detection using kinematic data.","PeriodicalId":429222,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","volume":"151 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gait events detection from heel and toe trajectories: comparison of methods using multiple datasets\",\"authors\":\"V. Guimarães, I. Sousa, M. Correia\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MeMeA52024.2021.9478606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reliable detection of gait events is important to ensure accurate assessment of gait. While it is usually performed resorting to force platforms, methods based uniquely on kinematic analysis have also been proposed. These methods place no restrictions on the number of steps that can be analysed, simplifying setup and complexity of assessments. They also replace the need of annotating events manually when force platforms are not available. Although few methods have been proposed in literature, validation studies are relatively scarce. In this study we present multiple methods for the detection of heel strike (HS) and toe off (TO) in normal walking, and validate the detection against annotated events using three different datasets. The best performing candidates are based on the evaluation of heel vertical velocity (for HS) and toe vertical acceleration (for TO), resulting in relative errors of -12.4 ± 32.9 ms for HS and of -15.5 ± 24.9 ms for TO. The method is compatible with barefoot and shod walking, constituting a convenient, fast and reliable alternative to automatic gait event detection using kinematic data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":429222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)\",\"volume\":\"151 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA52024.2021.9478606\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA52024.2021.9478606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

步态事件的可靠检测对于确保步态的准确评估至关重要。虽然通常是借助力平台进行的,但也提出了基于运动学分析的独特方法。这些方法对可以分析的步骤数量没有限制,简化了评估的设置和复杂性。当强制平台不可用时,它们还取代了手动注释事件的需要。虽然文献中提出的方法很少,但验证性研究相对较少。在这项研究中,我们提出了多种检测正常行走中脚跟撞击(HS)和脚趾脱落(TO)的方法,并使用三个不同的数据集验证了针对注释事件的检测。最佳候选鞋是基于对鞋跟垂直速度(HS)和脚趾垂直加速度(TO)的评估,HS和TO的相对误差分别为-12.4±32.9 ms和-15.5±24.9 ms。该方法兼容赤脚和穿鞋行走,是利用运动学数据自动检测步态事件的一种方便、快速、可靠的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gait events detection from heel and toe trajectories: comparison of methods using multiple datasets
Reliable detection of gait events is important to ensure accurate assessment of gait. While it is usually performed resorting to force platforms, methods based uniquely on kinematic analysis have also been proposed. These methods place no restrictions on the number of steps that can be analysed, simplifying setup and complexity of assessments. They also replace the need of annotating events manually when force platforms are not available. Although few methods have been proposed in literature, validation studies are relatively scarce. In this study we present multiple methods for the detection of heel strike (HS) and toe off (TO) in normal walking, and validate the detection against annotated events using three different datasets. The best performing candidates are based on the evaluation of heel vertical velocity (for HS) and toe vertical acceleration (for TO), resulting in relative errors of -12.4 ± 32.9 ms for HS and of -15.5 ± 24.9 ms for TO. The method is compatible with barefoot and shod walking, constituting a convenient, fast and reliable alternative to automatic gait event detection using kinematic data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信