爱沙尼亚民事法律关系司法保护的一些方面

A. Shabalin
{"title":"爱沙尼亚民事法律关系司法保护的一些方面","authors":"A. Shabalin","doi":"10.33731/62022.274648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Keywords: intellectual property law, codification, EU, civil procedure, civil law,CPC of Estonia \nThe scientific article examines the peculiarities of the civil proceduralorder for the protection of law in Estonia. Attention is paid to the genesis of modernEstonian civil justice, the peculiarities of some civil legal procedures for considerationand resolution of civil cases are established. It is concluded that all civillegal disputes are resolved according to the rules of civil proceedings, includingdisputes about the protection of intellectual property rights and the protection ofownership rights to immovable property. Instead, there are exceptions — these aredisputes related to European patents, which are resolved in accordance with theAgreement on the Unified European Patent Court. This approach is fully in linewith the pan-European digitalization strategy. Attention is also paid to the implementationof European legal standards in civil justice in Estonia. Thus, it is indicatedthat Estonian courts must follow the relevant practice of the European Courtof Human Rights when deciding civil cases. In Estonia, the Supreme Court canturn to the European Court of Human Rights for an advisory decision on the application,interpretation, and interpretation of the law guaranteed by the Conventionon the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Moreover, theparticipants in the legal process, in case of disagreement with the decision of theEstonian courts, including the Supreme Court of Estonia, have the right to appealto the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU. It is stated that in the Estonian civil process there is a special procedure for the collectionof evidence in accordance with the requests of the EU member states to Estonia.Based on the research, theoretical conclusions and recommendations of relativelyeffective ways of updating (unification, codification) Ukrainian legislationwere formulated, in particular in the aspect of its adaptation to EU legislation.","PeriodicalId":356184,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some aspects of judicial protection of civil legal relations in Estonia\",\"authors\":\"A. Shabalin\",\"doi\":\"10.33731/62022.274648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Keywords: intellectual property law, codification, EU, civil procedure, civil law,CPC of Estonia \\nThe scientific article examines the peculiarities of the civil proceduralorder for the protection of law in Estonia. Attention is paid to the genesis of modernEstonian civil justice, the peculiarities of some civil legal procedures for considerationand resolution of civil cases are established. It is concluded that all civillegal disputes are resolved according to the rules of civil proceedings, includingdisputes about the protection of intellectual property rights and the protection ofownership rights to immovable property. Instead, there are exceptions — these aredisputes related to European patents, which are resolved in accordance with theAgreement on the Unified European Patent Court. This approach is fully in linewith the pan-European digitalization strategy. Attention is also paid to the implementationof European legal standards in civil justice in Estonia. Thus, it is indicatedthat Estonian courts must follow the relevant practice of the European Courtof Human Rights when deciding civil cases. In Estonia, the Supreme Court canturn to the European Court of Human Rights for an advisory decision on the application,interpretation, and interpretation of the law guaranteed by the Conventionon the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Moreover, theparticipants in the legal process, in case of disagreement with the decision of theEstonian courts, including the Supreme Court of Estonia, have the right to appealto the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU. It is stated that in the Estonian civil process there is a special procedure for the collectionof evidence in accordance with the requests of the EU member states to Estonia.Based on the research, theoretical conclusions and recommendations of relativelyeffective ways of updating (unification, codification) Ukrainian legislationwere formulated, in particular in the aspect of its adaptation to EU legislation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33731/62022.274648\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33731/62022.274648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关键词:知识产权法、法典化、欧盟、民事诉讼、民法、爱沙尼亚共产党这篇科学的文章考察了爱沙尼亚法律保护的民事诉讼秩序的特点。本文对现代爱沙尼亚民事司法的起源进行了探讨,并对审理和解决民事案件的一些民事法律程序的特点进行了阐述。认为所有民事违法纠纷,包括知识产权保护纠纷和不动产所有权保护纠纷,都是按照民事诉讼规则解决的。相反,也有例外——这些是与欧洲专利相关的争议,这些争议是根据欧洲统一专利法院协议解决的。这种方法完全符合泛欧数字化战略。爱沙尼亚还注意在民事司法方面执行欧洲法律标准。因此,有人指出,爱沙尼亚法院在裁决民事案件时必须遵循欧洲人权法院的有关做法。在爱沙尼亚,最高法院可以请欧洲人权法院就《保护人权和基本自由公约》所保障的法律的适用、解释和解释作出咨询决定。此外,法律程序的参与者,如果不同意爱沙尼亚法院,包括爱沙尼亚最高法院的决定,有权向欧洲人权法院和欧盟法院提出上诉。有人指出,在爱沙尼亚的民事程序中,有一项根据欧盟成员国向爱沙尼亚提出的要求收集证据的特别程序。在研究的基础上,提出了乌克兰立法更新(统一、编纂)的相对有效途径的理论结论和建议,特别是在乌克兰立法与欧盟立法的适应方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Some aspects of judicial protection of civil legal relations in Estonia
Keywords: intellectual property law, codification, EU, civil procedure, civil law,CPC of Estonia The scientific article examines the peculiarities of the civil proceduralorder for the protection of law in Estonia. Attention is paid to the genesis of modernEstonian civil justice, the peculiarities of some civil legal procedures for considerationand resolution of civil cases are established. It is concluded that all civillegal disputes are resolved according to the rules of civil proceedings, includingdisputes about the protection of intellectual property rights and the protection ofownership rights to immovable property. Instead, there are exceptions — these aredisputes related to European patents, which are resolved in accordance with theAgreement on the Unified European Patent Court. This approach is fully in linewith the pan-European digitalization strategy. Attention is also paid to the implementationof European legal standards in civil justice in Estonia. Thus, it is indicatedthat Estonian courts must follow the relevant practice of the European Courtof Human Rights when deciding civil cases. In Estonia, the Supreme Court canturn to the European Court of Human Rights for an advisory decision on the application,interpretation, and interpretation of the law guaranteed by the Conventionon the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Moreover, theparticipants in the legal process, in case of disagreement with the decision of theEstonian courts, including the Supreme Court of Estonia, have the right to appealto the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU. It is stated that in the Estonian civil process there is a special procedure for the collectionof evidence in accordance with the requests of the EU member states to Estonia.Based on the research, theoretical conclusions and recommendations of relativelyeffective ways of updating (unification, codification) Ukrainian legislationwere formulated, in particular in the aspect of its adaptation to EU legislation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信