GUI心理模型对可用性的影响

Wonseok Yang
{"title":"GUI心理模型对可用性的影响","authors":"Wonseok Yang","doi":"10.5821/conference-9788419184849.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Applications operated on smartphones and other devices with a small user interface area on the screen and a large number of functions and contents will inevitably increase the number of operation procedures and make them more complicated. However, compared to the attention paid to information architecture and interaction in realizing intuitive user interfaces, less attention is paid to icons, and there are many examples where generic icons are used. Therefore, when icons and the functions they represent are different for each application, or when icons are unintelligible because of the distance between the user's mental model and the icons, the cognitive burden on the user is amplified, which may affect usability. We compared the usability of icons, one of the GUI elements, by focusing on their metaphors, and showed that the selection of metaphors that are in line with users' mental models has a positive effect on usability by improving the performance of task completion time and the number of errors. This study clarified the influence of the degree of congruence between the metaphor used and the user's mental model on the usability of icons, one of the GUI elements.","PeriodicalId":433529,"journal":{"name":"9th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research. KEER2022. Proceedings","volume":"330 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of mental model of GUI on usability\",\"authors\":\"Wonseok Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.5821/conference-9788419184849.39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Applications operated on smartphones and other devices with a small user interface area on the screen and a large number of functions and contents will inevitably increase the number of operation procedures and make them more complicated. However, compared to the attention paid to information architecture and interaction in realizing intuitive user interfaces, less attention is paid to icons, and there are many examples where generic icons are used. Therefore, when icons and the functions they represent are different for each application, or when icons are unintelligible because of the distance between the user's mental model and the icons, the cognitive burden on the user is amplified, which may affect usability. We compared the usability of icons, one of the GUI elements, by focusing on their metaphors, and showed that the selection of metaphors that are in line with users' mental models has a positive effect on usability by improving the performance of task completion time and the number of errors. This study clarified the influence of the degree of congruence between the metaphor used and the user's mental model on the usability of icons, one of the GUI elements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"9th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research. KEER2022. Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"330 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"9th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research. KEER2022. Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5821/conference-9788419184849.39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"9th International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research. KEER2022. Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5821/conference-9788419184849.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在智能手机等屏幕用户界面面积小、功能和内容多的设备上运行的应用,必然会增加操作程序的数量,使其更加复杂。然而,在实现直观的用户界面时,相对于对信息架构和交互的关注,对图标的关注较少,使用通用图标的例子很多。因此,当每个应用程序的图标及其所代表的功能不同时,或者由于用户的心智模型与图标之间的距离而导致图标难以理解时,用户的认知负担就会被放大,从而影响可用性。我们通过对GUI元素之一的图标的隐喻进行比较,发现选择符合用户心理模型的隐喻对可用性有积极的影响,可以提高任务完成时间和错误次数的表现。本研究阐明了隐喻与用户心理模型的一致性对图形用户界面元素之一的图标可用性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of mental model of GUI on usability
Applications operated on smartphones and other devices with a small user interface area on the screen and a large number of functions and contents will inevitably increase the number of operation procedures and make them more complicated. However, compared to the attention paid to information architecture and interaction in realizing intuitive user interfaces, less attention is paid to icons, and there are many examples where generic icons are used. Therefore, when icons and the functions they represent are different for each application, or when icons are unintelligible because of the distance between the user's mental model and the icons, the cognitive burden on the user is amplified, which may affect usability. We compared the usability of icons, one of the GUI elements, by focusing on their metaphors, and showed that the selection of metaphors that are in line with users' mental models has a positive effect on usability by improving the performance of task completion time and the number of errors. This study clarified the influence of the degree of congruence between the metaphor used and the user's mental model on the usability of icons, one of the GUI elements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信