Nurul Ainiy, Alif Saida Al-Husna, Imroatul Ngarifah, Fadhli Hakim Bahtiyar, Nur Qomari
{"title":"Taḥdīd Mi‘yār al-Kafā’ah li-al-Ḥadd al-Adná (KKM) li-Māddat al-Lughah al-‘Arabīyah fī al-Madrasah al-Ibtidā’īyah","authors":"Nurul Ainiy, Alif Saida Al-Husna, Imroatul Ngarifah, Fadhli Hakim Bahtiyar, Nur Qomari","doi":"10.21009/almakrifah.19.02.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Defining the Minimum Completeness Criteria (KKM) is the first stage of implementing learning outcome assessment as part of curriculum development. Students are said to succeed in a subject if they achieve the minimum completeness criteria specified in the syllabus. This research aims to study the procedures and the method used to defining the minimum completeness criteria for Arabic lessons at Al-Fattah Elementary School, Batu, Malang. This study used the descriptive-qualitative method. Data collection methods include observation, interviews, and documentation. The results indicate that defining the minimum completeness criteria for Arabic lessons in Al-Fattah Elementary School follows two procedures. First, the Subject Teachers’ Consultation Council (MGMP) defines the minimum completeness criteria at the beginning of the school year, and for each basic competency (KD), its standard is 67, and Arabic language lesson have a standard of 71. Secondly, the minimum completeness criteria that have been defined are published for all Arabic teachers. The process of defining minimum completeness criteria in this school uses the value range method to assign the level of complexity, level of students’ absorption capacity, and efficiency level of auxiliary resources, and then calculates it using the appropriate formula to get the exact score.","PeriodicalId":243843,"journal":{"name":"Al-Ma‘rifah","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Ma‘rifah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21009/almakrifah.19.02.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定义最小完整性标准(KKM)是实施学习成果评估作为课程开发的一部分的第一步。如果学生达到了教学大纲中规定的最低完成标准,他们就被认为在一门学科上取得了成功。本研究旨在研究玛琅巴图Al-Fattah小学阿拉伯语课程最低完整性标准的定义程序和方法。本研究采用描述定性方法。数据收集方法包括观察、访谈和记录。结果表明,确定Al-Fattah小学阿拉伯语课程的最低完整性标准遵循两个程序。首先,学科教师咨询委员会(MGMP)在学年开始时定义了最低完整性标准,对于每个基本能力(KD),其标准为67,阿拉伯语课程的标准为71。其次,为所有阿拉伯语教师发布了已定义的最低完整性标准。该学校在确定最小完备性标准的过程中,采用数值范围法对复杂程度、学生吸收能力水平、辅助资源效率水平进行赋值,然后用合适的公式进行计算,得到准确的分数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Taḥdīd Mi‘yār al-Kafā’ah li-al-Ḥadd al-Adná (KKM) li-Māddat al-Lughah al-‘Arabīyah fī al-Madrasah al-Ibtidā’īyah
Defining the Minimum Completeness Criteria (KKM) is the first stage of implementing learning outcome assessment as part of curriculum development. Students are said to succeed in a subject if they achieve the minimum completeness criteria specified in the syllabus. This research aims to study the procedures and the method used to defining the minimum completeness criteria for Arabic lessons at Al-Fattah Elementary School, Batu, Malang. This study used the descriptive-qualitative method. Data collection methods include observation, interviews, and documentation. The results indicate that defining the minimum completeness criteria for Arabic lessons in Al-Fattah Elementary School follows two procedures. First, the Subject Teachers’ Consultation Council (MGMP) defines the minimum completeness criteria at the beginning of the school year, and for each basic competency (KD), its standard is 67, and Arabic language lesson have a standard of 71. Secondly, the minimum completeness criteria that have been defined are published for all Arabic teachers. The process of defining minimum completeness criteria in this school uses the value range method to assign the level of complexity, level of students’ absorption capacity, and efficiency level of auxiliary resources, and then calculates it using the appropriate formula to get the exact score.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信