《2016年国际商事合同通则》,跨越浊水的桥梁——从长期用户的角度审视《通则》

Eckart Broedermann
{"title":"《2016年国际商事合同通则》,跨越浊水的桥梁——从长期用户的角度审视《通则》","authors":"Eckart Broedermann","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3491669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With a particular focus on the perspective of readers from common law legal systems, this article sets forth why the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts 2016 constitute an important tool for international contract drafting. Using the picture of a “bridge over troubled waters”, the article starts by setting the scene with some examples of different approaches to legal issues in different legal cultures (“troubled waters”). There exists a business need for a bridge across these troubled waters. The article then describes the reasons why the UNIDROIT Principles can serve as a such a – stable – bridge, with due regard to the circumstances of their making and their contents. It gives examples from the authors practical experience with the UNIDROIT Principles since 2001, in arbitration and in international contracting. The article further discusses existing freedoms and limits in using the UNIDROIT Principles. In concluding, the article goes so far to argue that, in some circumstances, using the UNIDROIT Principles 2016 as a tool may avoid malpractice for lawyers and ensure state of the art conduct of international business as required as a matter of corporate law.","PeriodicalId":313622,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts 2016, a Bridge over Troubled Waters - An Overview of the UNIDROIT Principles from the Perspective of a Long Time User\",\"authors\":\"Eckart Broedermann\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3491669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With a particular focus on the perspective of readers from common law legal systems, this article sets forth why the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts 2016 constitute an important tool for international contract drafting. Using the picture of a “bridge over troubled waters”, the article starts by setting the scene with some examples of different approaches to legal issues in different legal cultures (“troubled waters”). There exists a business need for a bridge across these troubled waters. The article then describes the reasons why the UNIDROIT Principles can serve as a such a – stable – bridge, with due regard to the circumstances of their making and their contents. It gives examples from the authors practical experience with the UNIDROIT Principles since 2001, in arbitration and in international contracting. The article further discusses existing freedoms and limits in using the UNIDROIT Principles. In concluding, the article goes so far to argue that, in some circumstances, using the UNIDROIT Principles 2016 as a tool may avoid malpractice for lawyers and ensure state of the art conduct of international business as required as a matter of corporate law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3491669\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3491669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文特别关注普通法法系读者的视角,阐述了为什么《2016年国际商事合同通则》是国际合同起草的重要工具。文章以“浑水上的桥”为例,以不同法律文化(“浑水”)中处理法律问题的不同方法为背景。企业需要在这些混乱的水域之间架起一座桥梁。接着,文章阐述了《通法通则》为何能成为这样一座稳定的桥梁的原因,并适当考虑了其制定的情况及其内容。本文列举了作者自2001年以来在仲裁和国际合同方面运用《统法通则》的实践经验。文章进一步讨论了使用统一法协原则的现有自由和限制。最后,本文认为,在某些情况下,使用《2016年通则》作为工具可以避免律师的不当行为,并确保按照公司法的要求进行最先进的国际商业行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts 2016, a Bridge over Troubled Waters - An Overview of the UNIDROIT Principles from the Perspective of a Long Time User
With a particular focus on the perspective of readers from common law legal systems, this article sets forth why the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts 2016 constitute an important tool for international contract drafting. Using the picture of a “bridge over troubled waters”, the article starts by setting the scene with some examples of different approaches to legal issues in different legal cultures (“troubled waters”). There exists a business need for a bridge across these troubled waters. The article then describes the reasons why the UNIDROIT Principles can serve as a such a – stable – bridge, with due regard to the circumstances of their making and their contents. It gives examples from the authors practical experience with the UNIDROIT Principles since 2001, in arbitration and in international contracting. The article further discusses existing freedoms and limits in using the UNIDROIT Principles. In concluding, the article goes so far to argue that, in some circumstances, using the UNIDROIT Principles 2016 as a tool may avoid malpractice for lawyers and ensure state of the art conduct of international business as required as a matter of corporate law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信