{"title":"对第五部分的回应","authors":"Nimi Wariboko","doi":"10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823284603.003.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nimi Wariboko affirms Ezigbo and Hartman for their pioneering efforts in drawing Barth into conversation with African religious traditions, even as he cautions against their emphasis on common ground rather than genuine difference. He concludes with a question that ought to occupy all scholars engaged in comparative work between such different traditions: how to compare text-based discourse with “fragments of social life”?","PeriodicalId":446621,"journal":{"name":"Karl Barth and Comparative Theology","volume":"356 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to Part V\",\"authors\":\"Nimi Wariboko\",\"doi\":\"10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823284603.003.0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nimi Wariboko affirms Ezigbo and Hartman for their pioneering efforts in drawing Barth into conversation with African religious traditions, even as he cautions against their emphasis on common ground rather than genuine difference. He concludes with a question that ought to occupy all scholars engaged in comparative work between such different traditions: how to compare text-based discourse with “fragments of social life”?\",\"PeriodicalId\":446621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Karl Barth and Comparative Theology\",\"volume\":\"356 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Karl Barth and Comparative Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823284603.003.0017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karl Barth and Comparative Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5422/FORDHAM/9780823284603.003.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Nimi Wariboko肯定了Ezigbo和Hartman在吸引Barth与非洲宗教传统对话方面的开创性努力，尽管他警告说他们强调共同点而不是真正的差异。他最后提出了一个应该困扰所有从事不同传统之间比较工作的学者的问题:如何将基于文本的话语与“社会生活的片段”进行比较?
Nimi Wariboko affirms Ezigbo and Hartman for their pioneering efforts in drawing Barth into conversation with African religious traditions, even as he cautions against their emphasis on common ground rather than genuine difference. He concludes with a question that ought to occupy all scholars engaged in comparative work between such different traditions: how to compare text-based discourse with “fragments of social life”?
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
