多语法化对语言学理论的挑战

S. Robert
{"title":"多语法化对语言学理论的挑战","authors":"S. Robert","doi":"10.1075/COGLS.00015.ROB","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Transcategorial morphemes share the common ability to be used synchronically across different syntactic categories (synchronic\n grammaticalization). This paper first shows that transcategoriality is a general property of linguistic systems, variously\n exploited by languages, then addresses the theoretical questions raised by these morphemes. A new model accounting for this\n transcategorial functioning, named “fractal grammar”, is proposed and illustrated by various examples. The analysis for this\n particular functioning relates the polysemy of these morphemes to their syntactic flexibility in a dynamic way: the variation of\n the syntactic scope of the morpheme (“fractal functioning”) is triggered by its environment and produces its polysemy (variation\n of the semantic scope). Fractal grammar is thus defined by two basic mechanisms: the construal of a common image-schema (“scale\n invariance”), accounting for the unity of the morpheme, and the activation of “scale (or level) properties”, accounting for the\n semantic and syntactic variations. A typological sketch of transcategoriality is then sketched, in relation to the strategies used\n by linguistic systems for the distribution of grammatical information. Three types of transcategorial strategies are\n distinguished: “oriented”, “generic”, and “functional” transcategoriality. The status of linguistic categories is then discussed\n in the light of the analysis of these particular morphemes.","PeriodicalId":127458,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Linguistic Studies","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The challenge of polygrammaticalization for linguistic theory\",\"authors\":\"S. Robert\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/COGLS.00015.ROB\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Transcategorial morphemes share the common ability to be used synchronically across different syntactic categories (synchronic\\n grammaticalization). This paper first shows that transcategoriality is a general property of linguistic systems, variously\\n exploited by languages, then addresses the theoretical questions raised by these morphemes. A new model accounting for this\\n transcategorial functioning, named “fractal grammar”, is proposed and illustrated by various examples. The analysis for this\\n particular functioning relates the polysemy of these morphemes to their syntactic flexibility in a dynamic way: the variation of\\n the syntactic scope of the morpheme (“fractal functioning”) is triggered by its environment and produces its polysemy (variation\\n of the semantic scope). Fractal grammar is thus defined by two basic mechanisms: the construal of a common image-schema (“scale\\n invariance”), accounting for the unity of the morpheme, and the activation of “scale (or level) properties”, accounting for the\\n semantic and syntactic variations. A typological sketch of transcategoriality is then sketched, in relation to the strategies used\\n by linguistic systems for the distribution of grammatical information. Three types of transcategorial strategies are\\n distinguished: “oriented”, “generic”, and “functional” transcategoriality. The status of linguistic categories is then discussed\\n in the light of the analysis of these particular morphemes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Linguistic Studies\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Linguistic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/COGLS.00015.ROB\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Linguistic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/COGLS.00015.ROB","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

跨范畴语素具有跨不同句法范畴同步使用的共同能力(共时语法化)。本文首先说明了跨范畴性是语言系统的一个普遍属性,被各种语言所利用,然后解决了这些语素所带来的理论问题。提出了一种新的跨范畴功能模型,称为“分形语法”,并通过各种例子加以说明。对这一特殊功能的分析以动态的方式将语素的多义性与其句法灵活性联系起来:语素的句法范围的变化(分形功能)是由其所处的环境引发的,并产生其多义性(语义范围的变化)。分形语法由两种基本机制定义:一种是共同意象图式的解释(“尺度不变性”),它解释了语素的统一性;另一种是“尺度(或水平)属性”的激活,它解释了语义和句法的变化。然后勾画出跨范畴性的类型学草图,与语言系统用于语法信息分布的策略有关。跨范畴策略分为“定向型”、“一般型”和“功能性”三种类型。然后根据对这些特定语素的分析来讨论语言范畴的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The challenge of polygrammaticalization for linguistic theory
Transcategorial morphemes share the common ability to be used synchronically across different syntactic categories (synchronic grammaticalization). This paper first shows that transcategoriality is a general property of linguistic systems, variously exploited by languages, then addresses the theoretical questions raised by these morphemes. A new model accounting for this transcategorial functioning, named “fractal grammar”, is proposed and illustrated by various examples. The analysis for this particular functioning relates the polysemy of these morphemes to their syntactic flexibility in a dynamic way: the variation of the syntactic scope of the morpheme (“fractal functioning”) is triggered by its environment and produces its polysemy (variation of the semantic scope). Fractal grammar is thus defined by two basic mechanisms: the construal of a common image-schema (“scale invariance”), accounting for the unity of the morpheme, and the activation of “scale (or level) properties”, accounting for the semantic and syntactic variations. A typological sketch of transcategoriality is then sketched, in relation to the strategies used by linguistic systems for the distribution of grammatical information. Three types of transcategorial strategies are distinguished: “oriented”, “generic”, and “functional” transcategoriality. The status of linguistic categories is then discussed in the light of the analysis of these particular morphemes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信