公民住房权益及其公证保护。

E. Izmailova
{"title":"公民住房权益及其公证保护。","authors":"E. Izmailova","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2022.1.6.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article defines the limits of notary participation in protection of subjective rights and interests of housing relations participants. The question of the correlation between the terms «notarial protection» and «notarial defence» is investigated, and the author gives the arguments in favor of the legislator's position which refers all notarial acts to measures of protection of rights and interests of citizens and legal entities. The ambiguity of understanding the terms «conflict regime», «undisputed regime», «violation of rights and interests» is demonstrated. The scientific debate on the issue of objects of notarial protection is illustrated, the conclusion that subjective rights and interests can act as such objects is formulated. The author draws attention to the absence of an established approach to the distinction of these protection objects types in the science of civil law, analyzes the provisions of the norms of civil and housing legislation, fixing situations of notaries participation in housing rights and interests protection, and indicates the timeliness of the legislative decision on introduction of obligatory notarial certifications of transactions with shares in the right of ownership of dwelling premises. The conclusion about the necessity of the further step-by-step expansion of notaries participation in protection of the subjective rights and interests of participants of housing relationships is formulated.","PeriodicalId":433311,"journal":{"name":"Prologue: Law Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Housing Rights and Interests of Citizens and Their Notarial Protection.\",\"authors\":\"E. Izmailova\",\"doi\":\"10.21639/2313-6715.2022.1.6.\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article defines the limits of notary participation in protection of subjective rights and interests of housing relations participants. The question of the correlation between the terms «notarial protection» and «notarial defence» is investigated, and the author gives the arguments in favor of the legislator's position which refers all notarial acts to measures of protection of rights and interests of citizens and legal entities. The ambiguity of understanding the terms «conflict regime», «undisputed regime», «violation of rights and interests» is demonstrated. The scientific debate on the issue of objects of notarial protection is illustrated, the conclusion that subjective rights and interests can act as such objects is formulated. The author draws attention to the absence of an established approach to the distinction of these protection objects types in the science of civil law, analyzes the provisions of the norms of civil and housing legislation, fixing situations of notaries participation in housing rights and interests protection, and indicates the timeliness of the legislative decision on introduction of obligatory notarial certifications of transactions with shares in the right of ownership of dwelling premises. The conclusion about the necessity of the further step-by-step expansion of notaries participation in protection of the subjective rights and interests of participants of housing relationships is formulated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prologue: Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prologue: Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2022.1.6.\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prologue: Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2022.1.6.","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文明确了公证参与对房屋关系参与人主观权益保护的界限。对“公证保护”与“公证辩护”之间的关系问题进行了探讨,并支持立法者将所有公证行为都视为保护公民和法人权益的措施的立场。论证了对“冲突政权”、“无争议政权”、“侵犯权益”等术语理解的模糊性。通过对公证保护客体问题的科学论证,得出了主观权益可以作为公证保护客体的结论。注意到民法学界对这些保护对象类型的区分缺乏一种确定的方法,分析了民事和住房立法规范的规定,确定了公证人参与住房权益保护的情况,并指出了立法决定对房屋所有权交易实行强制性公证证明的及时性。提出了进一步逐步扩大公证员参与住房关系参与人主观权益保护的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Housing Rights and Interests of Citizens and Their Notarial Protection.
The article defines the limits of notary participation in protection of subjective rights and interests of housing relations participants. The question of the correlation between the terms «notarial protection» and «notarial defence» is investigated, and the author gives the arguments in favor of the legislator's position which refers all notarial acts to measures of protection of rights and interests of citizens and legal entities. The ambiguity of understanding the terms «conflict regime», «undisputed regime», «violation of rights and interests» is demonstrated. The scientific debate on the issue of objects of notarial protection is illustrated, the conclusion that subjective rights and interests can act as such objects is formulated. The author draws attention to the absence of an established approach to the distinction of these protection objects types in the science of civil law, analyzes the provisions of the norms of civil and housing legislation, fixing situations of notaries participation in housing rights and interests protection, and indicates the timeliness of the legislative decision on introduction of obligatory notarial certifications of transactions with shares in the right of ownership of dwelling premises. The conclusion about the necessity of the further step-by-step expansion of notaries participation in protection of the subjective rights and interests of participants of housing relationships is formulated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信