经皮迷走神经刺激成功治疗COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征病例报告

Patrick Do, Ivan Evlogiev
{"title":"经皮迷走神经刺激成功治疗COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征病例报告","authors":"Patrick Do, Ivan Evlogiev","doi":"10.33425/2639-8494.1040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We report two individuals who successfully recovered from COVID-19-induced ARDS after being treated with transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS). In the first case, taVNS was started after eleven hospital days of continual deterioration despite mechanical ventilation along with supportive therapy of steroids, antibiotics, and immunoglobulins. On the twelfth day of hospitalization, taVNS was begun four times daily, resulting in sudden improvement in oxygenation. There was a concomitant reduction of c-reactive protein from 109.6 μg/mL to 10 μg/mL. After nine days of taVNS therapy, the patient's improved respiratory function improved enough that she was able to be extubated. No additional treatments had been added or changed during this time. After twenty-seven days of hospitalization, the patient was discharged to home without supplemental oxygen. The second case involves taVNS therapy in the home setting. After nineteen days of progressive deterioration, the patient's oxygen saturation declined to 90% on room air before taVNS treatment was instituted. After tens days of taVNS treatment three times daily, his oxygen saturation had climbed to 97%, and by day 25 of VNS therapy, the patient felt he was fully recovered. taVNS is capable of improving regulation of the inflammatory response in other clinical conditions such as autoimmune disorders in humans and septic shock in animal models. We suggest that transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation is potent enough to improve the clinical course of COVID-19 associated ARDS because of its potential to minimize the clinical deterioration associated with the immunological surge known as the cytokine storm. taVNS is a safe and potentially efficacious treatment for COVID-19 ARDS.","PeriodicalId":191133,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Immunology & Research","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case Report: Successful Treatment of COVID-19 ARDS with Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Do, Ivan Evlogiev\",\"doi\":\"10.33425/2639-8494.1040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We report two individuals who successfully recovered from COVID-19-induced ARDS after being treated with transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS). In the first case, taVNS was started after eleven hospital days of continual deterioration despite mechanical ventilation along with supportive therapy of steroids, antibiotics, and immunoglobulins. On the twelfth day of hospitalization, taVNS was begun four times daily, resulting in sudden improvement in oxygenation. There was a concomitant reduction of c-reactive protein from 109.6 μg/mL to 10 μg/mL. After nine days of taVNS therapy, the patient's improved respiratory function improved enough that she was able to be extubated. No additional treatments had been added or changed during this time. After twenty-seven days of hospitalization, the patient was discharged to home without supplemental oxygen. The second case involves taVNS therapy in the home setting. After nineteen days of progressive deterioration, the patient's oxygen saturation declined to 90% on room air before taVNS treatment was instituted. After tens days of taVNS treatment three times daily, his oxygen saturation had climbed to 97%, and by day 25 of VNS therapy, the patient felt he was fully recovered. taVNS is capable of improving regulation of the inflammatory response in other clinical conditions such as autoimmune disorders in humans and septic shock in animal models. We suggest that transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation is potent enough to improve the clinical course of COVID-19 associated ARDS because of its potential to minimize the clinical deterioration associated with the immunological surge known as the cytokine storm. taVNS is a safe and potentially efficacious treatment for COVID-19 ARDS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Immunology & Research\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Immunology & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-8494.1040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Immunology & Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-8494.1040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们报告两例经皮耳迷走神经刺激(taVNS)治疗后成功从covid -19诱导的ARDS中康复的患者。在第一个病例中,尽管机械通气以及类固醇、抗生素和免疫球蛋白的支持治疗,taVNS仍在持续恶化11天后开始。在住院第12天,每天开始4次taVNS,导致氧合突然改善。同时,c反应蛋白从109.6 μg/mL降至10 μg/mL。经过9天的taVNS治疗,患者的呼吸功能得到了改善,可以拔管了。在此期间没有增加或改变其他治疗方法。住院27天后,患者出院回家,没有补充氧气。第二个病例涉及在家庭环境中进行taVNS治疗。经过19天的进行性恶化,在taVNS治疗开始前,患者的氧饱和度在室内空气中下降到90%。经每日3次taVNS治疗10天后,患者血氧饱和度攀升至97%,经VNS治疗第25天,患者感觉完全康复。taVNS能够改善其他临床条件下的炎症反应调节,如人类自身免疫性疾病和动物感染性休克。我们认为经皮耳迷走神经刺激足以改善COVID-19相关ARDS的临床病程,因为它有可能最大限度地减少与免疫激增(称为细胞因子风暴)相关的临床恶化。taVNS是一种安全且潜在有效的治疗COVID-19 ARDS的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Case Report: Successful Treatment of COVID-19 ARDS with Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation
We report two individuals who successfully recovered from COVID-19-induced ARDS after being treated with transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS). In the first case, taVNS was started after eleven hospital days of continual deterioration despite mechanical ventilation along with supportive therapy of steroids, antibiotics, and immunoglobulins. On the twelfth day of hospitalization, taVNS was begun four times daily, resulting in sudden improvement in oxygenation. There was a concomitant reduction of c-reactive protein from 109.6 μg/mL to 10 μg/mL. After nine days of taVNS therapy, the patient's improved respiratory function improved enough that she was able to be extubated. No additional treatments had been added or changed during this time. After twenty-seven days of hospitalization, the patient was discharged to home without supplemental oxygen. The second case involves taVNS therapy in the home setting. After nineteen days of progressive deterioration, the patient's oxygen saturation declined to 90% on room air before taVNS treatment was instituted. After tens days of taVNS treatment three times daily, his oxygen saturation had climbed to 97%, and by day 25 of VNS therapy, the patient felt he was fully recovered. taVNS is capable of improving regulation of the inflammatory response in other clinical conditions such as autoimmune disorders in humans and septic shock in animal models. We suggest that transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation is potent enough to improve the clinical course of COVID-19 associated ARDS because of its potential to minimize the clinical deterioration associated with the immunological surge known as the cytokine storm. taVNS is a safe and potentially efficacious treatment for COVID-19 ARDS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信