物业主导型再生项目方案的比较分析——以伦敦和东京为例

Seung-Yeoun Cho, Kwan-Soo Joo, Ok-yeon Kim, Joojin Kim
{"title":"物业主导型再生项目方案的比较分析——以伦敦和东京为例","authors":"Seung-Yeoun Cho, Kwan-Soo Joo, Ok-yeon Kim, Joojin Kim","doi":"10.5804/LHIJ.2014.5.4.281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This comparative analysis on the project scheme of property-led regeneration of UK and Japan aimed to suggest the implications for economy-based urban regeneration of Korea. Property-led regeneration attract private capital by deregulation and public investment since 1980s' neoliberalism. Its effectiveness for creating job and economic growth is demonstrated through last decades. The cases of property-led urban regeneration of 2000s, such as Stratford, King's Cross, Otemach and Shinonome, show decrease of public direct investment, promoting deregulation. It also proved that property-led urban regeneration has a great ripple effect to local economy. And the partnership among central and local governments, public development corporations, private developers and other local interest groups is emphasized for delivering successful urban regeneration. Especially, human empowerment of local government and responsibility of public organization are also required to deliver urban regeneration.","PeriodicalId":365439,"journal":{"name":"LHI journal of land, housing, and urban affairs","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis on Project Scheme of Property-led Regeneration: Focused on Cases of London and Tokyo\",\"authors\":\"Seung-Yeoun Cho, Kwan-Soo Joo, Ok-yeon Kim, Joojin Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.5804/LHIJ.2014.5.4.281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This comparative analysis on the project scheme of property-led regeneration of UK and Japan aimed to suggest the implications for economy-based urban regeneration of Korea. Property-led regeneration attract private capital by deregulation and public investment since 1980s' neoliberalism. Its effectiveness for creating job and economic growth is demonstrated through last decades. The cases of property-led urban regeneration of 2000s, such as Stratford, King's Cross, Otemach and Shinonome, show decrease of public direct investment, promoting deregulation. It also proved that property-led urban regeneration has a great ripple effect to local economy. And the partnership among central and local governments, public development corporations, private developers and other local interest groups is emphasized for delivering successful urban regeneration. Especially, human empowerment of local government and responsibility of public organization are also required to deliver urban regeneration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LHI journal of land, housing, and urban affairs\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LHI journal of land, housing, and urban affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5804/LHIJ.2014.5.4.281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LHI journal of land, housing, and urban affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5804/LHIJ.2014.5.4.281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过对英国和日本以房地产为主导的城市再生项目方案的比较分析,旨在提出对韩国以经济为基础的城市再生的启示。自20世纪80年代的新自由主义以来,房地产主导的再生通过放松管制和公共投资吸引私人资本。它在创造就业和经济增长方面的有效性在过去几十年得到了证明。斯特拉特福德(Stratford)、国王十字(King’s Cross)、奥特马奇(Otemach)和筱诺米(Shinonome)等2000年代房地产主导的城市再生案例显示,公共直接投资减少,促进了放松管制。这也证明了房地产主导的城市更新对当地经济产生了巨大的连锁反应。并强调中央和地方政府、公共开发公司、私人开发商和其他地方利益团体之间的合作关系,以实现成功的城市再生。尤其需要地方政府的人性赋权和公共组织的责任来实现城市更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Analysis on Project Scheme of Property-led Regeneration: Focused on Cases of London and Tokyo
This comparative analysis on the project scheme of property-led regeneration of UK and Japan aimed to suggest the implications for economy-based urban regeneration of Korea. Property-led regeneration attract private capital by deregulation and public investment since 1980s' neoliberalism. Its effectiveness for creating job and economic growth is demonstrated through last decades. The cases of property-led urban regeneration of 2000s, such as Stratford, King's Cross, Otemach and Shinonome, show decrease of public direct investment, promoting deregulation. It also proved that property-led urban regeneration has a great ripple effect to local economy. And the partnership among central and local governments, public development corporations, private developers and other local interest groups is emphasized for delivering successful urban regeneration. Especially, human empowerment of local government and responsibility of public organization are also required to deliver urban regeneration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信