验证工程的生产力

M. Staples, Ross Jeffery, June Andronick, Toby C. Murray, G. Klein, Rafal Kolanski
{"title":"验证工程的生产力","authors":"M. Staples, Ross Jeffery, June Andronick, Toby C. Murray, G. Klein, Rafal Kolanski","doi":"10.1145/2652524.2652551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Recent projects such as L4.verified (the verification of the seL4 microkernel) have demonstrated that large-scale formal program verification is now becoming practical.\n Objective: We address an important but unstudied aspect of proof engineering: proof productivity.\n Method: We extracted size and effort data from the history of the development of nine projects associated with L4.verified.\n Results: We find strong linear relationships between effort and proof size for projects and for individuals. We discuss opportunities and limitations with the use of lines of proof as a size measure, and discuss the importance of understanding proof productivity for future research.\n Conclusions: An understanding of proof productivity will assist in its further industrial application and provide a basis for cost estimation and understanding of rework and tool usage.","PeriodicalId":124452,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Productivity for proof engineering\",\"authors\":\"M. Staples, Ross Jeffery, June Andronick, Toby C. Murray, G. Klein, Rafal Kolanski\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2652524.2652551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: Recent projects such as L4.verified (the verification of the seL4 microkernel) have demonstrated that large-scale formal program verification is now becoming practical.\\n Objective: We address an important but unstudied aspect of proof engineering: proof productivity.\\n Method: We extracted size and effort data from the history of the development of nine projects associated with L4.verified.\\n Results: We find strong linear relationships between effort and proof size for projects and for individuals. We discuss opportunities and limitations with the use of lines of proof as a size measure, and discuss the importance of understanding proof productivity for future research.\\n Conclusions: An understanding of proof productivity will assist in its further industrial application and provide a basis for cost estimation and understanding of rework and tool usage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2652524.2652551\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2652524.2652551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

背景:最近的项目,如L4。(seL4微内核的验证)已经证明大规模的正式程序验证现在变得可行。目的:我们解决证明工程的一个重要但尚未研究的方面:证明生产力。方法:我们从与L4.verified相关的9个项目的开发历史中提取规模和工作量数据。结果:我们发现项目和个人的工作量和证明大小之间存在很强的线性关系。我们讨论了使用证明线作为尺寸度量的机会和局限性,并讨论了理解证明生产力对未来研究的重要性。结论:对打样效率的理解将有助于其进一步的工业应用,并为成本估算和理解返工和工具使用提供基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Productivity for proof engineering
Context: Recent projects such as L4.verified (the verification of the seL4 microkernel) have demonstrated that large-scale formal program verification is now becoming practical. Objective: We address an important but unstudied aspect of proof engineering: proof productivity. Method: We extracted size and effort data from the history of the development of nine projects associated with L4.verified. Results: We find strong linear relationships between effort and proof size for projects and for individuals. We discuss opportunities and limitations with the use of lines of proof as a size measure, and discuss the importance of understanding proof productivity for future research. Conclusions: An understanding of proof productivity will assist in its further industrial application and provide a basis for cost estimation and understanding of rework and tool usage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信