联邦刑法改革:隐性成本,虚幻收益

K. F. Brickey
{"title":"联邦刑法改革:隐性成本,虚幻收益","authors":"K. F. Brickey","doi":"10.1525/NCLR.1998.2.1.161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anyone who has ventured into federal criminal law knows it is impossible to consult the federal criminal “code”—and I use the term advisedly— without becoming aware of peculiarities in its structure and content. Its well-documented shortcomings make proposals for federal criminal code reform sound like sweet reason, especially when the proponents speak with the authority that comes from years of working with and for the code reform effort. While it is hard to quarrel with their cogent calls for order and rationality in the federal law of crimes, the code reform debate often overlooks important realities of federal criminal law and criminal lawmaking that call into question whether code reform is practicable—or even advisable—at this time. The reforms recommended by the Brown Com-","PeriodicalId":344882,"journal":{"name":"Buffalo Criminal Law Review","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Federal Criminal Code Reform: Hidden Costs, Illusory Benefits\",\"authors\":\"K. F. Brickey\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/NCLR.1998.2.1.161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anyone who has ventured into federal criminal law knows it is impossible to consult the federal criminal “code”—and I use the term advisedly— without becoming aware of peculiarities in its structure and content. Its well-documented shortcomings make proposals for federal criminal code reform sound like sweet reason, especially when the proponents speak with the authority that comes from years of working with and for the code reform effort. While it is hard to quarrel with their cogent calls for order and rationality in the federal law of crimes, the code reform debate often overlooks important realities of federal criminal law and criminal lawmaking that call into question whether code reform is practicable—or even advisable—at this time. The reforms recommended by the Brown Com-\",\"PeriodicalId\":344882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Buffalo Criminal Law Review\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Buffalo Criminal Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/NCLR.1998.2.1.161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buffalo Criminal Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/NCLR.1998.2.1.161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

任何冒险研究过联邦刑法的人都知道,查阅联邦刑法“法典”——我是有意使用这个词的——是不可能不意识到其结构和内容的特殊性的。联邦刑法典改革的缺点有据可查,这使得联邦刑法典改革的建议听起来像是一个甜蜜的理由,尤其是当支持者与多年来与法典改革工作并为之努力的权威人士交谈时。虽然很难反驳他们对联邦刑法秩序和理性的有力呼吁,但关于法典改革的辩论往往忽视了联邦刑法和刑事立法的重要现实,这些现实让人质疑,在这个时候,法典改革是否可行,甚至是否明智。布朗委员会建议的改革
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Federal Criminal Code Reform: Hidden Costs, Illusory Benefits
Anyone who has ventured into federal criminal law knows it is impossible to consult the federal criminal “code”—and I use the term advisedly— without becoming aware of peculiarities in its structure and content. Its well-documented shortcomings make proposals for federal criminal code reform sound like sweet reason, especially when the proponents speak with the authority that comes from years of working with and for the code reform effort. While it is hard to quarrel with their cogent calls for order and rationality in the federal law of crimes, the code reform debate often overlooks important realities of federal criminal law and criminal lawmaking that call into question whether code reform is practicable—or even advisable—at this time. The reforms recommended by the Brown Com-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信