工厂搜查和第四修正案:平衡执法和宪法保障

D. Olivas
{"title":"工厂搜查和第四修正案:平衡执法和宪法保障","authors":"D. Olivas","doi":"10.5070/C770020955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Supreme Court of the United States will soon decide whether Fourth Amendment standards will prohibit certain tactics used in the enforcement of immigration laws by the Immigration and Naturalization Service. This Comment will argue that the tactics in question cannot withstand constitutional scrutiny; to uphold these tactics would simply deny well-entrenched precedent and run afoul of public policy. If the Court affirms the lower court's decision, factory workforces will be protected from unreasonable searches and seizures.","PeriodicalId":411033,"journal":{"name":"Chicana/o-Latina/o Law Review","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factory Raids and the Fourth Amendment: Balancing Law Enforcement and Constitutional Guarantees in\",\"authors\":\"D. Olivas\",\"doi\":\"10.5070/C770020955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Supreme Court of the United States will soon decide whether Fourth Amendment standards will prohibit certain tactics used in the enforcement of immigration laws by the Immigration and Naturalization Service. This Comment will argue that the tactics in question cannot withstand constitutional scrutiny; to uphold these tactics would simply deny well-entrenched precedent and run afoul of public policy. If the Court affirms the lower court's decision, factory workforces will be protected from unreasonable searches and seizures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":411033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chicana/o-Latina/o Law Review\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chicana/o-Latina/o Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5070/C770020955\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chicana/o-Latina/o Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/C770020955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国最高法院将很快决定第四修正案的标准是否会禁止移民和归化局在执行移民法时使用的某些策略。本评论将争辩说,有问题的策略经不起宪法审查;坚持这些策略只会否定根深蒂固的先例,并与公共政策相冲突。如果最高法院维持下级法院的判决,工厂工人将受到保护,免受不合理的搜查和扣押。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factory Raids and the Fourth Amendment: Balancing Law Enforcement and Constitutional Guarantees in
The Supreme Court of the United States will soon decide whether Fourth Amendment standards will prohibit certain tactics used in the enforcement of immigration laws by the Immigration and Naturalization Service. This Comment will argue that the tactics in question cannot withstand constitutional scrutiny; to uphold these tactics would simply deny well-entrenched precedent and run afoul of public policy. If the Court affirms the lower court's decision, factory workforces will be protected from unreasonable searches and seizures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信