Shania Lelepadang, Ridwansyah Nuhun, N. Nasrul, Siti Nurjanah Ahmad
{"title":"分析刚性建设成本与弹性结构(FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT)(案例研究:md教授街、肯达里市市长街)","authors":"Shania Lelepadang, Ridwansyah Nuhun, N. Nasrul, Siti Nurjanah Ahmad","doi":"10.55679/jts.v8i3.16192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRAKKajian penelitian tentang perbandingan biaya konstruksi perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement) dan perkerasan lenutr (flexible pavement) bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbandingan biaya perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement) dan perkerasan lentur (flexible pavement) maupun dari unsur pekerjaan pada jalan Prof.M.Yamin dan membandingkan kedua alternatif penggunaan lapisan perkerasan dari segi biaya konstruksi, sehingga didapatkan alternative yang paling baik dan menguntungkan. Perencanaan tebal perkerasan menggunakan analisis komponen (Metode Bina Marga) untuk lapis pondasi agregat dan metode yang dikembangkan oleh NAASRA (National Association of Australian State Road Authorities) untuk pondasi beton. Data yang diperlukan dalam analisis tersebut menliputi daftar harga satuan, draft penggunaan alat berat, harga satuan barang dan jasa, dan gambar pekerjaan. Hasil penelitian ini diperoleh besaran Perbandingan biaya konstruksi perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement) sebesar Rp. 3.044.749.683,- dan perkerasan lentur (flexible pavement) sebesar Rp. 2.993.386.135,- dengan selisih perbandingan biaya sebesar Rp. 51.363.548,- dan alternative yang paling menguntungkan adalah perkerasan lentur (flexible pavement) dikarenakan biaya konstruksi untuk perkerasan tersebut lebih murah dibandingkan dari perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement). ABSTRACTThe research study on the comparison of the cost of rigid pavement and flexible pavement construction aims to determine the comparison of the cost of rigid pavement and flexible pavement as well as from the elements of work on Prof.M.Yamin's road and to compare the second alternative is the use of pavement layers in terms of construction costs, so that the best and most profitable alternative is obtained. Pavement thickness planning uses component analysis (Bina Marga Method) for aggregate base layers and a method developed by NAASRA (National Association of Australian State Road Authorities) for concrete foundations. The data required in the analysis includes a list of unit prices, drafts of heavy equipment use, unit prices for goods and services, and work drawings. The results of this study are that the ratio of the cost of rigid pavement construction is Rp. 3,044,749,683, - and flexible pavement of Rp. 2,993,386,135, - with a difference in cost comparison of Rp. 51,363,548, - and the most profitable alternative is flexible pavement because the construction cost for the pavement is cheaper than rigid pavement.","PeriodicalId":149094,"journal":{"name":"STABILITA || Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN BIAYA KONSTRUKSI PERKERASAN KAKU (RIGID PAVEMENT) DAN PERKERASAN LENTUR (FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT) (Studi Kasus : Jalan Prof. M. Yamin, Kelurahan Puuwatu, Kota Kendari)\",\"authors\":\"Shania Lelepadang, Ridwansyah Nuhun, N. Nasrul, Siti Nurjanah Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.55679/jts.v8i3.16192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRAKKajian penelitian tentang perbandingan biaya konstruksi perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement) dan perkerasan lenutr (flexible pavement) bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbandingan biaya perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement) dan perkerasan lentur (flexible pavement) maupun dari unsur pekerjaan pada jalan Prof.M.Yamin dan membandingkan kedua alternatif penggunaan lapisan perkerasan dari segi biaya konstruksi, sehingga didapatkan alternative yang paling baik dan menguntungkan. Perencanaan tebal perkerasan menggunakan analisis komponen (Metode Bina Marga) untuk lapis pondasi agregat dan metode yang dikembangkan oleh NAASRA (National Association of Australian State Road Authorities) untuk pondasi beton. Data yang diperlukan dalam analisis tersebut menliputi daftar harga satuan, draft penggunaan alat berat, harga satuan barang dan jasa, dan gambar pekerjaan. Hasil penelitian ini diperoleh besaran Perbandingan biaya konstruksi perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement) sebesar Rp. 3.044.749.683,- dan perkerasan lentur (flexible pavement) sebesar Rp. 2.993.386.135,- dengan selisih perbandingan biaya sebesar Rp. 51.363.548,- dan alternative yang paling menguntungkan adalah perkerasan lentur (flexible pavement) dikarenakan biaya konstruksi untuk perkerasan tersebut lebih murah dibandingkan dari perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement). ABSTRACTThe research study on the comparison of the cost of rigid pavement and flexible pavement construction aims to determine the comparison of the cost of rigid pavement and flexible pavement as well as from the elements of work on Prof.M.Yamin's road and to compare the second alternative is the use of pavement layers in terms of construction costs, so that the best and most profitable alternative is obtained. Pavement thickness planning uses component analysis (Bina Marga Method) for aggregate base layers and a method developed by NAASRA (National Association of Australian State Road Authorities) for concrete foundations. The data required in the analysis includes a list of unit prices, drafts of heavy equipment use, unit prices for goods and services, and work drawings. The results of this study are that the ratio of the cost of rigid pavement construction is Rp. 3,044,749,683, - and flexible pavement of Rp. 2,993,386,135, - with a difference in cost comparison of Rp. 51,363,548, - and the most profitable alternative is flexible pavement because the construction cost for the pavement is cheaper than rigid pavement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STABILITA || Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STABILITA || Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55679/jts.v8i3.16192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STABILITA || Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55679/jts.v8i3.16192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
ABSTRAKKajian研究比较僵硬(rigid人行道路面的建设成本和lenutr (flexible人行道路面)旨在探讨比较僵硬(rigid人行道路面)费用和灵活(flexible人行道路面)和元素的工作道路上M教授。雅和替代比较一下两个层的路面使用方面的建设成本,从而获得最好的另类和有利可图。大胆的平面图使用成分分析(构建一个团队方法)来建立混凝土基础。分析所需的数据提供了单一价格表、重型设备使用量、商品和服务价格以及就业图像。这项研究结果比较大规模的建筑成本刚性路面(rigid人行道)总计3044749683 -和灵活(flexible人行道路面)总计2993386135和差额总计费用比较。- 51363548 -,最赚钱的另类是灵活(flexible人行道路面)相比,由于路面的建设成本更便宜的僵硬(rigid人行道路面)。根据教授的研究,关于购买的代价和灵活的购买的代价的研究。雅悯之路和第二种替代方案是建筑工程的共同作用,所以最好的和最强大的替代方案得到了控制。为可持续发展的基础研究所设计的资金分析。分析中所要求的数据包括一份清单,一份重型设备的清单,一份好的服务和工作清单的清单。The results of this study ratio》就是那个rigid人行道建筑的成本是$ 3,044,749,683,Rp -》和flexible人行道。2,993,386,135,- with a不同的成本不那么可怜的Rp。51,363,548,-《最另类盈利flexible人行道就是因为《人行道的建设成本是cheaper than rigid人行道。
ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN BIAYA KONSTRUKSI PERKERASAN KAKU (RIGID PAVEMENT) DAN PERKERASAN LENTUR (FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT) (Studi Kasus : Jalan Prof. M. Yamin, Kelurahan Puuwatu, Kota Kendari)
ABSTRAKKajian penelitian tentang perbandingan biaya konstruksi perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement) dan perkerasan lenutr (flexible pavement) bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbandingan biaya perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement) dan perkerasan lentur (flexible pavement) maupun dari unsur pekerjaan pada jalan Prof.M.Yamin dan membandingkan kedua alternatif penggunaan lapisan perkerasan dari segi biaya konstruksi, sehingga didapatkan alternative yang paling baik dan menguntungkan. Perencanaan tebal perkerasan menggunakan analisis komponen (Metode Bina Marga) untuk lapis pondasi agregat dan metode yang dikembangkan oleh NAASRA (National Association of Australian State Road Authorities) untuk pondasi beton. Data yang diperlukan dalam analisis tersebut menliputi daftar harga satuan, draft penggunaan alat berat, harga satuan barang dan jasa, dan gambar pekerjaan. Hasil penelitian ini diperoleh besaran Perbandingan biaya konstruksi perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement) sebesar Rp. 3.044.749.683,- dan perkerasan lentur (flexible pavement) sebesar Rp. 2.993.386.135,- dengan selisih perbandingan biaya sebesar Rp. 51.363.548,- dan alternative yang paling menguntungkan adalah perkerasan lentur (flexible pavement) dikarenakan biaya konstruksi untuk perkerasan tersebut lebih murah dibandingkan dari perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement). ABSTRACTThe research study on the comparison of the cost of rigid pavement and flexible pavement construction aims to determine the comparison of the cost of rigid pavement and flexible pavement as well as from the elements of work on Prof.M.Yamin's road and to compare the second alternative is the use of pavement layers in terms of construction costs, so that the best and most profitable alternative is obtained. Pavement thickness planning uses component analysis (Bina Marga Method) for aggregate base layers and a method developed by NAASRA (National Association of Australian State Road Authorities) for concrete foundations. The data required in the analysis includes a list of unit prices, drafts of heavy equipment use, unit prices for goods and services, and work drawings. The results of this study are that the ratio of the cost of rigid pavement construction is Rp. 3,044,749,683, - and flexible pavement of Rp. 2,993,386,135, - with a difference in cost comparison of Rp. 51,363,548, - and the most profitable alternative is flexible pavement because the construction cost for the pavement is cheaper than rigid pavement.