土地异化与土地权利颠覆策略:来自阿塔帕迪的视角

K. Manjusha, Bipin Jojo
{"title":"土地异化与土地权利颠覆策略:来自阿塔帕迪的视角","authors":"K. Manjusha, Bipin Jojo","doi":"10.1177/23210249221129389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While it is unanimously agreed that Kerala’s development achieved major success in human development, such as minimum social security, food security, minimum gender differences in education, as well as easy and affordable access to health care, the question has not been so far addressed from the perspective of the grass root people, the adivasis. We feel this is high time to redefine what is real ‘development’ through the perspective of the adivasis. Emerging from an ethnographic and oral historical field work, this article examines how the absence of individual property ownership adversely affect the adivasis of Attappady in achieving their favoured development. This article additionally discusses how and why authorities have historically maintained the adivasis as a labour force. The most effective solution to put an end to the land question in Attappady is that authorities need to provide them with Individual Property Right within the Collective Right of Land.","PeriodicalId":118277,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Land and Rural Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Land Alienation and Subversion Strategies on Land Rights: Perspectives from Attappady\",\"authors\":\"K. Manjusha, Bipin Jojo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23210249221129389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While it is unanimously agreed that Kerala’s development achieved major success in human development, such as minimum social security, food security, minimum gender differences in education, as well as easy and affordable access to health care, the question has not been so far addressed from the perspective of the grass root people, the adivasis. We feel this is high time to redefine what is real ‘development’ through the perspective of the adivasis. Emerging from an ethnographic and oral historical field work, this article examines how the absence of individual property ownership adversely affect the adivasis of Attappady in achieving their favoured development. This article additionally discusses how and why authorities have historically maintained the adivasis as a labour force. The most effective solution to put an end to the land question in Attappady is that authorities need to provide them with Individual Property Right within the Collective Right of Land.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Land and Rural Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Land and Rural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23210249221129389\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Land and Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23210249221129389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然人们一致认为,喀拉拉邦的发展在人类发展方面取得了重大成功,例如最低限度的社会保障、粮食安全、教育方面的最低性别差异,以及方便和负担得起的医疗保健,但迄今为止还没有从基层人民即土著人的角度解决这个问题。我们觉得现在是时候通过原住民的视角重新定义什么是真正的“发展”了。本文从民族志和口述历史领域的研究出发,探讨了个人财产所有权的缺失如何对阿塔帕迪原住民实现其有利的发展产生不利影响。本文还讨论了历史上当局如何以及为什么将原住民作为劳动力来维持。解决阿塔帕迪土地问题最有效的方法是,当局需要在集体土地权利中为他们提供个人产权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Land Alienation and Subversion Strategies on Land Rights: Perspectives from Attappady
While it is unanimously agreed that Kerala’s development achieved major success in human development, such as minimum social security, food security, minimum gender differences in education, as well as easy and affordable access to health care, the question has not been so far addressed from the perspective of the grass root people, the adivasis. We feel this is high time to redefine what is real ‘development’ through the perspective of the adivasis. Emerging from an ethnographic and oral historical field work, this article examines how the absence of individual property ownership adversely affect the adivasis of Attappady in achieving their favoured development. This article additionally discusses how and why authorities have historically maintained the adivasis as a labour force. The most effective solution to put an end to the land question in Attappady is that authorities need to provide them with Individual Property Right within the Collective Right of Land.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信