伊丽莎白·瓦伦丁的《心理学哲学与历史》

H. Wiseman
{"title":"伊丽莎白·瓦伦丁的《心理学哲学与历史》","authors":"H. Wiseman","doi":"10.53841/bpshpp.2017.18.1.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elizabeth Valentine’s work is a testament to an open-minded and inclusive psychologist seeking to find meaningful insights into human nature wherever she can. For Valentine, psychology is a hybrid science, it must make reference to human subjectivity, whilst still maintaining objectivity in its findings. Precisely this is the challenge that psychology as a science faces: how to do justice to human subjectivity in a reliably objective way. Yet, it is precisely because of this subjective element to human reality that psychology is so apt for conversation with insights from other domains – particularly philosophy. The relationship here is mutually beneficial. Philosophy requires psychology to keep it empirically grounded in reality; but psychology needs philosophy to broaden and enrich its conceptual landscape. By way of example, this paper will critically reflect on Valentine’s views of consciousness, and how psychologists should deal with the metaphysical problems surrounding the mind-brain relationship.","PeriodicalId":123600,"journal":{"name":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elizabeth Valentine’s ‘Philosophy and History of Psychology’\",\"authors\":\"H. Wiseman\",\"doi\":\"10.53841/bpshpp.2017.18.1.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Elizabeth Valentine’s work is a testament to an open-minded and inclusive psychologist seeking to find meaningful insights into human nature wherever she can. For Valentine, psychology is a hybrid science, it must make reference to human subjectivity, whilst still maintaining objectivity in its findings. Precisely this is the challenge that psychology as a science faces: how to do justice to human subjectivity in a reliably objective way. Yet, it is precisely because of this subjective element to human reality that psychology is so apt for conversation with insights from other domains – particularly philosophy. The relationship here is mutually beneficial. Philosophy requires psychology to keep it empirically grounded in reality; but psychology needs philosophy to broaden and enrich its conceptual landscape. By way of example, this paper will critically reflect on Valentine’s views of consciousness, and how psychologists should deal with the metaphysical problems surrounding the mind-brain relationship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History & Philosophy of Psychology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History & Philosophy of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpshpp.2017.18.1.36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History & Philosophy of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpshpp.2017.18.1.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伊丽莎白·瓦伦丁(Elizabeth Valentine)的作品证明了一位思想开放、包容的心理学家试图在任何可能的地方找到对人性有意义的见解。对于瓦伦丁来说,心理学是一门混合科学,它必须参考人的主观性,同时在其发现中仍然保持客观性。这正是心理学作为一门科学所面临的挑战:如何以可靠客观的方式公正地对待人的主体性。然而,正是由于人类现实中的这种主观因素,心理学才如此适合与来自其他领域的见解——尤其是哲学——进行对话。这里的关系是互利的。哲学要求心理学以经验为基础,立足于现实;但是心理学需要哲学来拓宽和丰富它的概念景观。通过举例,本文将批判性地反思瓦伦丁关于意识的观点,以及心理学家应该如何处理围绕心脑关系的形而上学问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Elizabeth Valentine’s ‘Philosophy and History of Psychology’
Elizabeth Valentine’s work is a testament to an open-minded and inclusive psychologist seeking to find meaningful insights into human nature wherever she can. For Valentine, psychology is a hybrid science, it must make reference to human subjectivity, whilst still maintaining objectivity in its findings. Precisely this is the challenge that psychology as a science faces: how to do justice to human subjectivity in a reliably objective way. Yet, it is precisely because of this subjective element to human reality that psychology is so apt for conversation with insights from other domains – particularly philosophy. The relationship here is mutually beneficial. Philosophy requires psychology to keep it empirically grounded in reality; but psychology needs philosophy to broaden and enrich its conceptual landscape. By way of example, this paper will critically reflect on Valentine’s views of consciousness, and how psychologists should deal with the metaphysical problems surrounding the mind-brain relationship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信