印度尼西亚宪法中限制人权适用的问题

Galuh Candra Purnamasari
{"title":"印度尼西亚宪法中限制人权适用的问题","authors":"Galuh Candra Purnamasari","doi":"10.25105/prio.v6i2.2439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the amendment, the constitutionality of human rights was realized in chapter X article 28A-28J, which shows that Indonesia is increasingly upholding human rights values with the transformation of these rights in the constitution. However, this is still debatable about the provision of non-derogable rights (Article 28I) and human rights limitation (Article 28J). Human rights that could be limited is human right which is categorized in derogable right. The problem is the failure to distinguish between human rights which its implementation could be limited and vice versa. This condition is exacerbated by systematic and conceptual errors in chapter X of the 1945 Constitution, which can cause problems in applying the provision of human rights restrictions, and in implementing the interpretation of the human rights restrictions by Constitutional Court. This paper used normative legal research with literature research. This paper find that that the implementation of human rights limitation in Indonesia has not been in accordance with the theories and principles of human rights law and is carried beyond the supposed.","PeriodicalId":335820,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problematika Penerapan Aturan Pembatasan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Konstitusi Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Galuh Candra Purnamasari\",\"doi\":\"10.25105/prio.v6i2.2439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After the amendment, the constitutionality of human rights was realized in chapter X article 28A-28J, which shows that Indonesia is increasingly upholding human rights values with the transformation of these rights in the constitution. However, this is still debatable about the provision of non-derogable rights (Article 28I) and human rights limitation (Article 28J). Human rights that could be limited is human right which is categorized in derogable right. The problem is the failure to distinguish between human rights which its implementation could be limited and vice versa. This condition is exacerbated by systematic and conceptual errors in chapter X of the 1945 Constitution, which can cause problems in applying the provision of human rights restrictions, and in implementing the interpretation of the human rights restrictions by Constitutional Court. This paper used normative legal research with literature research. This paper find that that the implementation of human rights limitation in Indonesia has not been in accordance with the theories and principles of human rights law and is carried beyond the supposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25105/prio.v6i2.2439\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25105/prio.v6i2.2439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

修改后的第X章第28A-28J条实现了人权的合宪性,这说明随着这些权利在宪法中的转化,印尼越来越坚持人权价值观。然而,关于不可克减权利的规定(第28I条)和人权限制(第28J条)仍然存在争议。可以限制的人权是属于可减损权利的人权。问题在于未能区分人权,人权的执行可能受到限制,反之亦然。1945年《宪法》第十章中有系统的和概念上的错误使这种情况更加恶化,这些错误可能在适用人权限制的规定和执行宪法法院对人权限制的解释方面造成问题。本文采用规范法学研究与文献研究相结合的方法。本文发现,印尼对人权限制的实施并不符合人权法的理论和原则,而且超出了预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Problematika Penerapan Aturan Pembatasan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Konstitusi Indonesia
After the amendment, the constitutionality of human rights was realized in chapter X article 28A-28J, which shows that Indonesia is increasingly upholding human rights values with the transformation of these rights in the constitution. However, this is still debatable about the provision of non-derogable rights (Article 28I) and human rights limitation (Article 28J). Human rights that could be limited is human right which is categorized in derogable right. The problem is the failure to distinguish between human rights which its implementation could be limited and vice versa. This condition is exacerbated by systematic and conceptual errors in chapter X of the 1945 Constitution, which can cause problems in applying the provision of human rights restrictions, and in implementing the interpretation of the human rights restrictions by Constitutional Court. This paper used normative legal research with literature research. This paper find that that the implementation of human rights limitation in Indonesia has not been in accordance with the theories and principles of human rights law and is carried beyond the supposed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信