CEO出席薪酬委员会:一个谜

G. Boyle, Helen Roberts
{"title":"CEO出席薪酬委员会:一个谜","authors":"G. Boyle, Helen Roberts","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1650826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The managerial power view of executive compensation suggests that CEO membership of the compensation committee is an open invitation to rent extraction by self-serving executives. However, using data from New Zealand – where CEO compensation committee membership was relatively common until quite recently – we find that annual pay increments for CEOs with this apparent advantage averaged four percentage points less than those enjoyed by other CEOs during the 1998–2005 period. This puzzling result cannot be explained by omitted governance variables, risk-return tradeoff considerations, selection bias, or compensation mis-measurement. We find some weak evidence suggesting it may be consistent with a form of optimal contracting.","PeriodicalId":417524,"journal":{"name":"FEN: Other International Corporate Finance (Topic)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CEO Presence on the Compensation Committee: A Puzzle\",\"authors\":\"G. Boyle, Helen Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1650826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The managerial power view of executive compensation suggests that CEO membership of the compensation committee is an open invitation to rent extraction by self-serving executives. However, using data from New Zealand – where CEO compensation committee membership was relatively common until quite recently – we find that annual pay increments for CEOs with this apparent advantage averaged four percentage points less than those enjoyed by other CEOs during the 1998–2005 period. This puzzling result cannot be explained by omitted governance variables, risk-return tradeoff considerations, selection bias, or compensation mis-measurement. We find some weak evidence suggesting it may be consistent with a form of optimal contracting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":417524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FEN: Other International Corporate Finance (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FEN: Other International Corporate Finance (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1650826\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEN: Other International Corporate Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1650826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

高管薪酬的管理权力观表明,CEO薪酬委员会的成员资格是对自私自利的高管收取租金的公开邀请。然而,我们利用新西兰的数据发现,在1998年至2005年期间,拥有这种明显优势的首席执行官的年薪酬增幅平均比其他首席执行官低4个百分点。直到最近,新西兰的首席执行官薪酬委员会成员才相对普遍。这个令人困惑的结果不能用省略的治理变量、风险回报权衡、选择偏差或补偿测量错误来解释。我们发现一些薄弱的证据表明,它可能与一种形式的最优收缩一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CEO Presence on the Compensation Committee: A Puzzle
The managerial power view of executive compensation suggests that CEO membership of the compensation committee is an open invitation to rent extraction by self-serving executives. However, using data from New Zealand – where CEO compensation committee membership was relatively common until quite recently – we find that annual pay increments for CEOs with this apparent advantage averaged four percentage points less than those enjoyed by other CEOs during the 1998–2005 period. This puzzling result cannot be explained by omitted governance variables, risk-return tradeoff considerations, selection bias, or compensation mis-measurement. We find some weak evidence suggesting it may be consistent with a form of optimal contracting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信