镇静-躁动与视觉模拟量表测定患者镇静状态的比较

A. Alami, Zahra Moradi, A. D. Noghabi, A. Hamzei
{"title":"镇静-躁动与视觉模拟量表测定患者镇静状态的比较","authors":"A. Alami, Zahra Moradi, A. D. Noghabi, A. Hamzei","doi":"10.18869/ACADPUB.HMS.22.2.159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To reduce discomfort and anxiety, providing true sedation for the patients hospitalized in ICU is very important. Therefore, the staff of ICU needs tools to measure effective sedation in the patients. The aim of this study was to assess the sedation status in the patients hospitalized in ICU via SedationAgitation Scale (SAS) and to compare the findings with Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Instrument & Methods: In this correlational study in 2015, 106 patients hospitalized in the intensive care units of Qaem Hospital of Mashhad, Iran, were selected via quota sampling method and studied. Sedation status of the patients was assessed by the validated Persian version of SAS and VAS. Data was analyzed by SPSS 20 software and Spearman’s correlation coefficient test. Findings: There was a positive and significant correlation between SAS and VAS (p<0.001; r=0.824). The highest scoring of SAS, which was 6, was equivalent to score 3 in VAS. In general, the higher the score of SAS, the higher the score of VAS was. Conclusion: SAS and VAS are in a high correlation to assess sedation. Therefore, SAS can be used as a valid tool in the treatment sector.","PeriodicalId":300087,"journal":{"name":"The Horizon of Medical Sciences","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between Sedation-Agitation and Visual Analog Scales in Determination of Sedation Status of Patients\",\"authors\":\"A. Alami, Zahra Moradi, A. D. Noghabi, A. Hamzei\",\"doi\":\"10.18869/ACADPUB.HMS.22.2.159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims: To reduce discomfort and anxiety, providing true sedation for the patients hospitalized in ICU is very important. Therefore, the staff of ICU needs tools to measure effective sedation in the patients. The aim of this study was to assess the sedation status in the patients hospitalized in ICU via SedationAgitation Scale (SAS) and to compare the findings with Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Instrument & Methods: In this correlational study in 2015, 106 patients hospitalized in the intensive care units of Qaem Hospital of Mashhad, Iran, were selected via quota sampling method and studied. Sedation status of the patients was assessed by the validated Persian version of SAS and VAS. Data was analyzed by SPSS 20 software and Spearman’s correlation coefficient test. Findings: There was a positive and significant correlation between SAS and VAS (p<0.001; r=0.824). The highest scoring of SAS, which was 6, was equivalent to score 3 in VAS. In general, the higher the score of SAS, the higher the score of VAS was. Conclusion: SAS and VAS are in a high correlation to assess sedation. Therefore, SAS can be used as a valid tool in the treatment sector.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Horizon of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Horizon of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18869/ACADPUB.HMS.22.2.159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Horizon of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18869/ACADPUB.HMS.22.2.159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:为ICU住院患者提供真正意义上的镇静对减轻患者的不适和焦虑具有重要意义。因此,ICU的工作人员需要工具来测量患者的有效镇静。本研究的目的是通过镇静搅拌量表(SAS)评估ICU住院患者的镇静状态,并与视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行比较。工具与方法:本相关性研究采用配额抽样方法,选取2015年在伊朗马什哈德Qaem医院重症监护病房住院的106例患者进行研究。采用经验证的波斯版SAS和VAS评估患者的镇静状态。数据分析采用SPSS 20软件,Spearman相关系数检验。结果:SAS与VAS存在显著正相关(p<0.001;r = 0.824)。SAS评分最高为6分,与VAS评分3分相当。一般情况下,SAS评分越高,VAS评分越高。结论:SAS和VAS在评价镇静作用方面具有较高的相关性。因此,SAS可以作为治疗领域的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between Sedation-Agitation and Visual Analog Scales in Determination of Sedation Status of Patients
Aims: To reduce discomfort and anxiety, providing true sedation for the patients hospitalized in ICU is very important. Therefore, the staff of ICU needs tools to measure effective sedation in the patients. The aim of this study was to assess the sedation status in the patients hospitalized in ICU via SedationAgitation Scale (SAS) and to compare the findings with Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Instrument & Methods: In this correlational study in 2015, 106 patients hospitalized in the intensive care units of Qaem Hospital of Mashhad, Iran, were selected via quota sampling method and studied. Sedation status of the patients was assessed by the validated Persian version of SAS and VAS. Data was analyzed by SPSS 20 software and Spearman’s correlation coefficient test. Findings: There was a positive and significant correlation between SAS and VAS (p<0.001; r=0.824). The highest scoring of SAS, which was 6, was equivalent to score 3 in VAS. In general, the higher the score of SAS, the higher the score of VAS was. Conclusion: SAS and VAS are in a high correlation to assess sedation. Therefore, SAS can be used as a valid tool in the treatment sector.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信