新闻与电影有限的自主权

J. Duval
{"title":"新闻与电影有限的自主权","authors":"J. Duval","doi":"10.4000/bssg.337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This text brings together reflections on how Pierre Bourdieu’s notion of autonomy, which he drew on in the context of his theory of fields, can be used in research on journalism and cinema. Journalism and cinema cannot easily be compared with pure specialist activities, but their essential traits fit the model and analysis that Bourdieu developed mainly on the basis of the French literary field. At the same time, these two universes seem to present less autonomy than the literary field, and unlike poetry, for example, they have continued to represent economic and political stakes. Finally, comparing the development of the two in France since the end of the nineteenth century shows that there have been rather long-term trends towards autonomization in both these social spaces. Over the past three or four decades, this movement has been characterized by dominant dynamics that, in certain regards, constitute a break with those trends.","PeriodicalId":300699,"journal":{"name":"Biens Symboliques / Symbolic Goods","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Restricted Autonomy of Journalism and Cinema\",\"authors\":\"J. Duval\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/bssg.337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This text brings together reflections on how Pierre Bourdieu’s notion of autonomy, which he drew on in the context of his theory of fields, can be used in research on journalism and cinema. Journalism and cinema cannot easily be compared with pure specialist activities, but their essential traits fit the model and analysis that Bourdieu developed mainly on the basis of the French literary field. At the same time, these two universes seem to present less autonomy than the literary field, and unlike poetry, for example, they have continued to represent economic and political stakes. Finally, comparing the development of the two in France since the end of the nineteenth century shows that there have been rather long-term trends towards autonomization in both these social spaces. Over the past three or four decades, this movement has been characterized by dominant dynamics that, in certain regards, constitute a break with those trends.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biens Symboliques / Symbolic Goods\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biens Symboliques / Symbolic Goods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/bssg.337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biens Symboliques / Symbolic Goods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/bssg.337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文汇集了对皮埃尔·布迪厄的自主性概念的思考,他在他的场域理论的背景下,可以在新闻和电影的研究中使用。新闻和电影不能轻易与纯粹的专业活动相提并论,但它们的本质特征符合布迪厄主要以法国文学领域为基础发展起来的模型和分析。与此同时,这两个领域似乎比文学领域表现出更少的自主性,而且不像诗歌,它们继续代表着经济和政治利益。最后,比较这两种社会空间自19世纪末以来在法国的发展,可以发现这两种社会空间都有相当长期的自治化趋势。在过去的三四十年里,这一运动的特点是主导动力,在某些方面,构成了与那些趋势的突破。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Restricted Autonomy of Journalism and Cinema
This text brings together reflections on how Pierre Bourdieu’s notion of autonomy, which he drew on in the context of his theory of fields, can be used in research on journalism and cinema. Journalism and cinema cannot easily be compared with pure specialist activities, but their essential traits fit the model and analysis that Bourdieu developed mainly on the basis of the French literary field. At the same time, these two universes seem to present less autonomy than the literary field, and unlike poetry, for example, they have continued to represent economic and political stakes. Finally, comparing the development of the two in France since the end of the nineteenth century shows that there have been rather long-term trends towards autonomization in both these social spaces. Over the past three or four decades, this movement has been characterized by dominant dynamics that, in certain regards, constitute a break with those trends.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信