I. Torshin, A. Lila, A. Naumov, A. Kochish, L. Alekseeva, E. Taskina, I. Sarvilina, A. Galustyan, A. N. Gromov, A. K. Khadzhidis, L. Vasilieva, E. F. Yevstratova, M. I. Udovika, O. Gromova
{"title":"软骨卫士治疗骨关节炎疗效临床试验的meta分析","authors":"I. Torshin, A. Lila, A. Naumov, A. Kochish, L. Alekseeva, E. Taskina, I. Sarvilina, A. Galustyan, A. N. Gromov, A. K. Khadzhidis, L. Vasilieva, E. F. Yevstratova, M. I. Udovika, O. Gromova","doi":"10.17749/2070-4909/FARMAKOEKONOMIKA.2020.066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim . A meta-analysis of 8 controlled studies (n=771, age 53.6±6.2 years) of tie use of tie Chondroguard (100 mg i.m. first 3 injections, from tie 4th injection - 200 mg i.m., EOD, course 20-30 injections) in the complex therapy of osteoarthritis (OA). Materials and Methods . Tie meta-analysis according to tie fixed-effects model included all published clinical studies on tie efficacy and safety of the CG drug in OA). The effectiveness of therapy was assessed using the VAS, Lequesne, WOMAC scales/indices. For each study, information was collected on 23 features. Data analysis was carried out using the MEDSTUDY and \"R\" software packages. Results . Meta-analysis confirmed significant associations between the use of Chondroguard (CG. and pain reduction assessed by the visual analog scale (V)S. - CG: a decrease in pain intensity by -28.3 points, control: -11.6; p=0.042. There was a significant reduction in pain according to VAS at night (CG: -20.1; control: -9.9; p=0.05018., while sitting or lying down (CG: -15.5; control: -7.6; p=0.01656., when walking (CG: -28.2; control: -17.0; p=0.04957). The use of CG led to a significant decrease in the scores of the Lequesne index (CG: -4.3; control: -1.4; p=0.0349., and of the WOMAC index (CG: -338.4; control: -219.8; p=0.004., including WOMAC \"function\" (CG: -247.8; control: -96; p=0.0027., and WOMAC \"stiffness\" (CG: -25.4; control: -11.2; p=0.0462.. The incidence of side effects did not differ significantly from the control. Conclusion . Chondroguard is an effective treatment for osteoarthritis and has a good safety profile.","PeriodicalId":201824,"journal":{"name":"FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomic and Pharmacoepidemiology","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-analysis of clinical trials of osteoarthritis treatment effectiveness with Chondroguard\",\"authors\":\"I. Torshin, A. Lila, A. Naumov, A. Kochish, L. Alekseeva, E. Taskina, I. Sarvilina, A. Galustyan, A. N. Gromov, A. K. Khadzhidis, L. Vasilieva, E. F. Yevstratova, M. I. Udovika, O. Gromova\",\"doi\":\"10.17749/2070-4909/FARMAKOEKONOMIKA.2020.066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim . A meta-analysis of 8 controlled studies (n=771, age 53.6±6.2 years) of tie use of tie Chondroguard (100 mg i.m. first 3 injections, from tie 4th injection - 200 mg i.m., EOD, course 20-30 injections) in the complex therapy of osteoarthritis (OA). Materials and Methods . Tie meta-analysis according to tie fixed-effects model included all published clinical studies on tie efficacy and safety of the CG drug in OA). The effectiveness of therapy was assessed using the VAS, Lequesne, WOMAC scales/indices. For each study, information was collected on 23 features. Data analysis was carried out using the MEDSTUDY and \\\"R\\\" software packages. Results . Meta-analysis confirmed significant associations between the use of Chondroguard (CG. and pain reduction assessed by the visual analog scale (V)S. - CG: a decrease in pain intensity by -28.3 points, control: -11.6; p=0.042. There was a significant reduction in pain according to VAS at night (CG: -20.1; control: -9.9; p=0.05018., while sitting or lying down (CG: -15.5; control: -7.6; p=0.01656., when walking (CG: -28.2; control: -17.0; p=0.04957). The use of CG led to a significant decrease in the scores of the Lequesne index (CG: -4.3; control: -1.4; p=0.0349., and of the WOMAC index (CG: -338.4; control: -219.8; p=0.004., including WOMAC \\\"function\\\" (CG: -247.8; control: -96; p=0.0027., and WOMAC \\\"stiffness\\\" (CG: -25.4; control: -11.2; p=0.0462.. The incidence of side effects did not differ significantly from the control. Conclusion . Chondroguard is an effective treatment for osteoarthritis and has a good safety profile.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomic and Pharmacoepidemiology\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomic and Pharmacoepidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/FARMAKOEKONOMIKA.2020.066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomic and Pharmacoepidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/FARMAKOEKONOMIKA.2020.066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Meta-analysis of clinical trials of osteoarthritis treatment effectiveness with Chondroguard
Aim . A meta-analysis of 8 controlled studies (n=771, age 53.6±6.2 years) of tie use of tie Chondroguard (100 mg i.m. first 3 injections, from tie 4th injection - 200 mg i.m., EOD, course 20-30 injections) in the complex therapy of osteoarthritis (OA). Materials and Methods . Tie meta-analysis according to tie fixed-effects model included all published clinical studies on tie efficacy and safety of the CG drug in OA). The effectiveness of therapy was assessed using the VAS, Lequesne, WOMAC scales/indices. For each study, information was collected on 23 features. Data analysis was carried out using the MEDSTUDY and "R" software packages. Results . Meta-analysis confirmed significant associations between the use of Chondroguard (CG. and pain reduction assessed by the visual analog scale (V)S. - CG: a decrease in pain intensity by -28.3 points, control: -11.6; p=0.042. There was a significant reduction in pain according to VAS at night (CG: -20.1; control: -9.9; p=0.05018., while sitting or lying down (CG: -15.5; control: -7.6; p=0.01656., when walking (CG: -28.2; control: -17.0; p=0.04957). The use of CG led to a significant decrease in the scores of the Lequesne index (CG: -4.3; control: -1.4; p=0.0349., and of the WOMAC index (CG: -338.4; control: -219.8; p=0.004., including WOMAC "function" (CG: -247.8; control: -96; p=0.0027., and WOMAC "stiffness" (CG: -25.4; control: -11.2; p=0.0462.. The incidence of side effects did not differ significantly from the control. Conclusion . Chondroguard is an effective treatment for osteoarthritis and has a good safety profile.