迫害造成严重伤害的刑事处罚

Fandaria Putri Yasin, Fence M. Wantu
{"title":"迫害造成严重伤害的刑事处罚","authors":"Fandaria Putri Yasin, Fence M. Wantu","doi":"10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to find out and analyze how to prove the verdict of a criminal offense that results in serious injury based on the title raised in this authorship. An author is a type of writer an Emperis law or a field writer. With a Case approach. The process of collecting data from regulations and other references related to the problem being studied. The results of this author show that the proof of the Determination of the criminal act of assault resulting in serious injury is said to be incorrect but if we refer to the court decision of the defendant/convicted person is proven to have committed a criminal act of assault resulting in serious injury, but is only sentenced to imprisonment for six (6) months. The judge’s role in determining the criminal act of assault resulting in serious injury is influenced by two counts, namely the judge's estimate that lawfully and convincingly committed the crime of persecution and the legal act used in the indictment article is more than Article 351 Paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code of persecution resulting in serious injury.","PeriodicalId":309785,"journal":{"name":"Estudiante Law Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Criminal Sanctions for Persecution Resulting in Serious Injury\",\"authors\":\"Fandaria Putri Yasin, Fence M. Wantu\",\"doi\":\"10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to find out and analyze how to prove the verdict of a criminal offense that results in serious injury based on the title raised in this authorship. An author is a type of writer an Emperis law or a field writer. With a Case approach. The process of collecting data from regulations and other references related to the problem being studied. The results of this author show that the proof of the Determination of the criminal act of assault resulting in serious injury is said to be incorrect but if we refer to the court decision of the defendant/convicted person is proven to have committed a criminal act of assault resulting in serious injury, but is only sentenced to imprisonment for six (6) months. The judge’s role in determining the criminal act of assault resulting in serious injury is influenced by two counts, namely the judge's estimate that lawfully and convincingly committed the crime of persecution and the legal act used in the indictment article is more than Article 351 Paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code of persecution resulting in serious injury.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudiante Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudiante Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudiante Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在根据作者提出的题目,找出并分析如何证明导致严重伤害的刑事犯罪的判决。作家是作家的一种类型是帝国法作家或田野作家。用Case方法。从与正在研究的问题有关的法规和其他参考资料中收集数据的过程。本作者的研究结果表明,认定致人重伤的攻击犯罪行为的证据据说是不正确的,但如果我们参考法院的判决,被告/被定罪人被证明犯有致人重伤的攻击犯罪行为,但只被判处6个月的监禁。法官在认定致人重伤犯罪行为中的作用受到两项罪名的影响,即法官对合法且令人信服地实施迫害罪的判断和起诉书条款所使用的法律行为超过《刑法》第351条第2款关于致人重伤的规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Criminal Sanctions for Persecution Resulting in Serious Injury
This study aims to find out and analyze how to prove the verdict of a criminal offense that results in serious injury based on the title raised in this authorship. An author is a type of writer an Emperis law or a field writer. With a Case approach. The process of collecting data from regulations and other references related to the problem being studied. The results of this author show that the proof of the Determination of the criminal act of assault resulting in serious injury is said to be incorrect but if we refer to the court decision of the defendant/convicted person is proven to have committed a criminal act of assault resulting in serious injury, but is only sentenced to imprisonment for six (6) months. The judge’s role in determining the criminal act of assault resulting in serious injury is influenced by two counts, namely the judge's estimate that lawfully and convincingly committed the crime of persecution and the legal act used in the indictment article is more than Article 351 Paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code of persecution resulting in serious injury.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信