{"title":"除了多利和代表团。解决问题的方法","authors":"P. Lazo","doi":"10.30682/specula0102b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this article is to review the arguments of the Roman lawyers of the 3rd century on the problems of delegatio and exceptio doli. The methodology is based on the analisis of fragments, excluding a textual-based critic. The results of the research show that\nthe Roman lawyers of the last period of the classical jurisprudence preferred to strenghthen the position of the creditor, by limiting the extent of the exceptio doli when used by the debtor.","PeriodicalId":272792,"journal":{"name":"VOL. 1 N. 2 (2021)","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXCEPTIO DOLI Y DELEGACIÓN. UNA APROXIMACIÓN A SUS PROBLEMAS\",\"authors\":\"P. Lazo\",\"doi\":\"10.30682/specula0102b\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this article is to review the arguments of the Roman lawyers of the 3rd century on the problems of delegatio and exceptio doli. The methodology is based on the analisis of fragments, excluding a textual-based critic. The results of the research show that\\nthe Roman lawyers of the last period of the classical jurisprudence preferred to strenghthen the position of the creditor, by limiting the extent of the exceptio doli when used by the debtor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VOL. 1 N. 2 (2021)\",\"volume\":\"112 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VOL. 1 N. 2 (2021)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30682/specula0102b\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VOL. 1 N. 2 (2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30682/specula0102b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
EXCEPTIO DOLI Y DELEGACIÓN. UNA APROXIMACIÓN A SUS PROBLEMAS
The objective of this article is to review the arguments of the Roman lawyers of the 3rd century on the problems of delegatio and exceptio doli. The methodology is based on the analisis of fragments, excluding a textual-based critic. The results of the research show that
the Roman lawyers of the last period of the classical jurisprudence preferred to strenghthen the position of the creditor, by limiting the extent of the exceptio doli when used by the debtor.