{"title":"陶瓷支架与釉面二硅酸锂不同粘结方式的剪切粘结强度","authors":"Aly Aboushady, A. Zaher, E. Abdullah","doi":"10.21608/eos.2021.79240.1018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of ceramic brackets to lithium disilicate using different bonding protocols. Materials and methods: Forty five lithium disilicate discs were embedded into acrylic resin. and randomly assigned to three equal groups (n=15), according to bonding protocol into: (A)Air abrasion with 50μm aluminum oxide particles + Assure Plus, (B) air abrasion with 50μm aluminum oxide particles + silane + Assure Plus (C) air abrasion with 50μm aluminum oxide particles + hydrofluoric acid etching + silane + Transbond XT Primer. Ceramic brackets were then bonded to the lithium disilicate discs using light curecomposite resin. Following thermocycling (500 cycles, 5° 55° C), shear bond strength(SBS) testing was performed with a universal testing machine. After bracket debonding Failure mode and Adhesive Remnant Index were assessed under a stereomicroscope. Results: No significant differences were found among the three groups regarding SBS, Group B showed the highest SBS values. Most specimens in Group B and Group C showed a failure at the bracket adhesive interface. Specimens in Group A showed a mixed cohesive-adhesive failure pattern Conclusion: All 3 groups exhibited shear bond strengths within the clinically acceptable level, samples recieving Air abrasion + Assure plus only displayed better debonding characteristic.","PeriodicalId":305086,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to glazed lithium disilicate using different bonding protocols\",\"authors\":\"Aly Aboushady, A. Zaher, E. Abdullah\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/eos.2021.79240.1018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of ceramic brackets to lithium disilicate using different bonding protocols. Materials and methods: Forty five lithium disilicate discs were embedded into acrylic resin. and randomly assigned to three equal groups (n=15), according to bonding protocol into: (A)Air abrasion with 50μm aluminum oxide particles + Assure Plus, (B) air abrasion with 50μm aluminum oxide particles + silane + Assure Plus (C) air abrasion with 50μm aluminum oxide particles + hydrofluoric acid etching + silane + Transbond XT Primer. Ceramic brackets were then bonded to the lithium disilicate discs using light curecomposite resin. Following thermocycling (500 cycles, 5° 55° C), shear bond strength(SBS) testing was performed with a universal testing machine. After bracket debonding Failure mode and Adhesive Remnant Index were assessed under a stereomicroscope. Results: No significant differences were found among the three groups regarding SBS, Group B showed the highest SBS values. Most specimens in Group B and Group C showed a failure at the bracket adhesive interface. Specimens in Group A showed a mixed cohesive-adhesive failure pattern Conclusion: All 3 groups exhibited shear bond strengths within the clinically acceptable level, samples recieving Air abrasion + Assure plus only displayed better debonding characteristic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/eos.2021.79240.1018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/eos.2021.79240.1018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to glazed lithium disilicate using different bonding protocols
Objectives: To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of ceramic brackets to lithium disilicate using different bonding protocols. Materials and methods: Forty five lithium disilicate discs were embedded into acrylic resin. and randomly assigned to three equal groups (n=15), according to bonding protocol into: (A)Air abrasion with 50μm aluminum oxide particles + Assure Plus, (B) air abrasion with 50μm aluminum oxide particles + silane + Assure Plus (C) air abrasion with 50μm aluminum oxide particles + hydrofluoric acid etching + silane + Transbond XT Primer. Ceramic brackets were then bonded to the lithium disilicate discs using light curecomposite resin. Following thermocycling (500 cycles, 5° 55° C), shear bond strength(SBS) testing was performed with a universal testing machine. After bracket debonding Failure mode and Adhesive Remnant Index were assessed under a stereomicroscope. Results: No significant differences were found among the three groups regarding SBS, Group B showed the highest SBS values. Most specimens in Group B and Group C showed a failure at the bracket adhesive interface. Specimens in Group A showed a mixed cohesive-adhesive failure pattern Conclusion: All 3 groups exhibited shear bond strengths within the clinically acceptable level, samples recieving Air abrasion + Assure plus only displayed better debonding characteristic.