目标跟踪与目标检测相结合的动物识别

Francis Williams, L. Kuncheva, Juan José Rodríguez Diez, Samuel L. Hennessey
{"title":"目标跟踪与目标检测相结合的动物识别","authors":"Francis Williams, L. Kuncheva, Juan José Rodríguez Diez, Samuel L. Hennessey","doi":"10.1109/IPAS55744.2022.10053017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While methods for object detection and tracking are well-developed for the purposes of human and vehicle identification, animal identification and re-identification from images and video is lagging behind. There is no clarity as to which object detection methods will work well on animal data. Here we compare two state-of-the art methods which output bounding boxes: the MMDetector and the UniTrack video tracker. Both methods were chosen for their high ranking on benchmark data sets. Using a bespoke pre-annotated database of five videos, we calculated the Average Precision (AP) of the outputs from the two methods. We propose a combination method to fuse the outputs of MMDetection and UniTrack and demonstrate that the proposed method is capable of outperforming both.","PeriodicalId":322228,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Image Processing Applications and Systems (IPAS)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination of Object Tracking and Object Detection for Animal Recognition\",\"authors\":\"Francis Williams, L. Kuncheva, Juan José Rodríguez Diez, Samuel L. Hennessey\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPAS55744.2022.10053017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While methods for object detection and tracking are well-developed for the purposes of human and vehicle identification, animal identification and re-identification from images and video is lagging behind. There is no clarity as to which object detection methods will work well on animal data. Here we compare two state-of-the art methods which output bounding boxes: the MMDetector and the UniTrack video tracker. Both methods were chosen for their high ranking on benchmark data sets. Using a bespoke pre-annotated database of five videos, we calculated the Average Precision (AP) of the outputs from the two methods. We propose a combination method to fuse the outputs of MMDetection and UniTrack and demonstrate that the proposed method is capable of outperforming both.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Image Processing Applications and Systems (IPAS)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Image Processing Applications and Systems (IPAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPAS55744.2022.10053017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Image Processing Applications and Systems (IPAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPAS55744.2022.10053017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然用于人类和车辆识别的目标检测和跟踪方法已经发展得很好,但动物识别和从图像和视频中重新识别还很落后。目前还不清楚哪种目标检测方法能很好地处理动物数据。在这里,我们比较两种最先进的输出边界框的方法:MMDetector和UniTrack视频跟踪器。选择这两种方法是因为它们在基准数据集上的高排名。使用预先标注的五个视频数据库,我们计算了两种方法输出的平均精度(AP)。我们提出了一种组合方法来融合MMDetection和UniTrack的输出,并证明了所提出的方法能够优于两者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combination of Object Tracking and Object Detection for Animal Recognition
While methods for object detection and tracking are well-developed for the purposes of human and vehicle identification, animal identification and re-identification from images and video is lagging behind. There is no clarity as to which object detection methods will work well on animal data. Here we compare two state-of-the art methods which output bounding boxes: the MMDetector and the UniTrack video tracker. Both methods were chosen for their high ranking on benchmark data sets. Using a bespoke pre-annotated database of five videos, we calculated the Average Precision (AP) of the outputs from the two methods. We propose a combination method to fuse the outputs of MMDetection and UniTrack and demonstrate that the proposed method is capable of outperforming both.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信