开发方法对开发项目成本和风险的影响

Bishan Dayal Chauhan, A. Rana, N. Sharma
{"title":"开发方法对开发项目成本和风险的影响","authors":"Bishan Dayal Chauhan, A. Rana, N. Sharma","doi":"10.1109/ICRITO.2017.8342436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In software projects, first of the challenges in projects is to manage successful delivery of the software project with minimal cost and high quality of software by constantly reducing & mitigating delivery risk. Cost control, Risk reduction & mitigation and success of a project becomes key focus for project manager. For reduction of cost & risk we need to first have the bird's eye of view which factors influence the risk & and impact success of the project, having this birds eye of view gives a ray of hope if development methodology being adopted for software development can help to reduce cost, risk and consequently increase success rate. Let's consider a hypotheses: Software development methodology used for developing software impacts success rate of project, risk and reduce cost. This study analyses this laid down hypothesis and test this relationship for various projects. Let's group methodologies into two groups, for developing the software namely Classical Software development life cycle methodology group (Classical SDLC Methodologies) & Agile methodologies, each of these methodologies groups have multiple models under each of these. This study researched both of these groups to analyze impact on fulfilling our laid down objectives of reduction in cost & risk and increased success rate of the project by picking one methodology from each group, Classical SDLC is older methodologies group comprising of Waterfall, spiral, Incremental etc. whereas Agile is a newer methodology group, particularly, it is researched that if Agile methodologies is better fit than Classical SDLC methodology — Waterfall model for meeting our core objectives. We obtained results for various completed projects and evidence is analyzed for deriving the final conclusion.","PeriodicalId":357118,"journal":{"name":"2017 6th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO)","volume":"352 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of development methodology on cost & risk for development projects\",\"authors\":\"Bishan Dayal Chauhan, A. Rana, N. Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICRITO.2017.8342436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In software projects, first of the challenges in projects is to manage successful delivery of the software project with minimal cost and high quality of software by constantly reducing & mitigating delivery risk. Cost control, Risk reduction & mitigation and success of a project becomes key focus for project manager. For reduction of cost & risk we need to first have the bird's eye of view which factors influence the risk & and impact success of the project, having this birds eye of view gives a ray of hope if development methodology being adopted for software development can help to reduce cost, risk and consequently increase success rate. Let's consider a hypotheses: Software development methodology used for developing software impacts success rate of project, risk and reduce cost. This study analyses this laid down hypothesis and test this relationship for various projects. Let's group methodologies into two groups, for developing the software namely Classical Software development life cycle methodology group (Classical SDLC Methodologies) & Agile methodologies, each of these methodologies groups have multiple models under each of these. This study researched both of these groups to analyze impact on fulfilling our laid down objectives of reduction in cost & risk and increased success rate of the project by picking one methodology from each group, Classical SDLC is older methodologies group comprising of Waterfall, spiral, Incremental etc. whereas Agile is a newer methodology group, particularly, it is researched that if Agile methodologies is better fit than Classical SDLC methodology — Waterfall model for meeting our core objectives. We obtained results for various completed projects and evidence is analyzed for deriving the final conclusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":357118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 6th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO)\",\"volume\":\"352 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 6th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRITO.2017.8342436\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 6th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRITO.2017.8342436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在软件项目中,项目中的第一个挑战是通过不断降低和减轻交付风险,以最小的成本和高质量的软件管理软件项目的成功交付。成本控制、风险降低和缓解以及项目的成功成为项目经理关注的焦点。为了降低成本和风险,我们首先需要鸟瞰影响风险和影响项目成功的因素,如果软件开发采用的开发方法有助于降低成本,风险并最终提高成功率,那么鸟瞰视图给了我们一线希望。让我们考虑一个假设:用于开发软件的软件开发方法影响项目的成功率、风险和降低成本。本研究分析了这一假设,并在不同的项目中检验了这种关系。让我们将方法论分为两组,用于开发软件,即经典软件开发生命周期方法论组(经典SDLC方法论)和敏捷方法论,每个方法论组都有多个模型。本研究研究了这两组,通过从每组中选择一种方法来分析对实现我们设定的降低成本和风险以及提高项目成功率的目标的影响,经典SDLC是由瀑布式、螺旋式、增量式等组成的较老的方法组,而敏捷是一个较新的方法组,特别是,如果敏捷方法比经典SDLC方法更适合,则研究了敏捷方法瀑布模型满足我们的核心目标。我们获得了各种已完成项目的结果,并分析了证据以得出最终结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of development methodology on cost & risk for development projects
In software projects, first of the challenges in projects is to manage successful delivery of the software project with minimal cost and high quality of software by constantly reducing & mitigating delivery risk. Cost control, Risk reduction & mitigation and success of a project becomes key focus for project manager. For reduction of cost & risk we need to first have the bird's eye of view which factors influence the risk & and impact success of the project, having this birds eye of view gives a ray of hope if development methodology being adopted for software development can help to reduce cost, risk and consequently increase success rate. Let's consider a hypotheses: Software development methodology used for developing software impacts success rate of project, risk and reduce cost. This study analyses this laid down hypothesis and test this relationship for various projects. Let's group methodologies into two groups, for developing the software namely Classical Software development life cycle methodology group (Classical SDLC Methodologies) & Agile methodologies, each of these methodologies groups have multiple models under each of these. This study researched both of these groups to analyze impact on fulfilling our laid down objectives of reduction in cost & risk and increased success rate of the project by picking one methodology from each group, Classical SDLC is older methodologies group comprising of Waterfall, spiral, Incremental etc. whereas Agile is a newer methodology group, particularly, it is researched that if Agile methodologies is better fit than Classical SDLC methodology — Waterfall model for meeting our core objectives. We obtained results for various completed projects and evidence is analyzed for deriving the final conclusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信