人机长期交互的用户体验

Guy Laban, Arvid Kappas, V. Morrison, Emily S. Cross
{"title":"人机长期交互的用户体验","authors":"Guy Laban, Arvid Kappas, V. Morrison, Emily S. Cross","doi":"10.1145/3527188.3563927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since interactions with social robots are novel and exciting for many people, one particular concern in this specific area of human-robot interaction (HRI) is the extent to which human users will experience the interactions positively over time, when the robot’s novelty is particularly salient. In the current paper, we investigated users’ experience in long-term HRIs; how users perceive the ongoing interactions and the robot’s ability to sustain it over time. Therefore, here we examine the effect of the repeated measures (10 testing sessions) and the discussion theme (Covid-19 related vs general) on the way participants experienced the interaction quality with a social robot and perceived the robot’s communication competency over time. We found that despite individual differences between the participants, over time participants found the interactions with Pepper to be of higher quality and that Pepper’s communication skills got better. Nevertheless, our results also stressed that the discussion theme has no meaningful nor significant effect on the way people perceive Pepper and the interaction.","PeriodicalId":179256,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User experience of human-robot long-term interactions\",\"authors\":\"Guy Laban, Arvid Kappas, V. Morrison, Emily S. Cross\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3527188.3563927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since interactions with social robots are novel and exciting for many people, one particular concern in this specific area of human-robot interaction (HRI) is the extent to which human users will experience the interactions positively over time, when the robot’s novelty is particularly salient. In the current paper, we investigated users’ experience in long-term HRIs; how users perceive the ongoing interactions and the robot’s ability to sustain it over time. Therefore, here we examine the effect of the repeated measures (10 testing sessions) and the discussion theme (Covid-19 related vs general) on the way participants experienced the interaction quality with a social robot and perceived the robot’s communication competency over time. We found that despite individual differences between the participants, over time participants found the interactions with Pepper to be of higher quality and that Pepper’s communication skills got better. Nevertheless, our results also stressed that the discussion theme has no meaningful nor significant effect on the way people perceive Pepper and the interaction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3527188.3563927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3527188.3563927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

由于与社交机器人的交互对许多人来说是新奇和令人兴奋的,因此在人机交互(HRI)的这个特定领域中,一个特别关注的问题是,当机器人的新颖性特别突出时,随着时间的推移,人类用户将在多大程度上积极地体验交互。在本文中,我们调查了长期HRIs的用户体验;用户如何感知正在进行的交互以及机器人随着时间的推移维持交互的能力。因此,随着时间的推移,我们研究了重复测量(10次测试)和讨论主题(Covid-19相关与一般)对参与者体验与社交机器人互动质量和感知机器人沟通能力的影响。我们发现,尽管参与者之间存在个体差异,但随着时间的推移,参与者发现与Pepper的互动质量更高,Pepper的沟通技巧也变得更好。然而,我们的研究结果也强调,讨论主题对人们感知Pepper和互动的方式没有意义或显著的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
User experience of human-robot long-term interactions
Since interactions with social robots are novel and exciting for many people, one particular concern in this specific area of human-robot interaction (HRI) is the extent to which human users will experience the interactions positively over time, when the robot’s novelty is particularly salient. In the current paper, we investigated users’ experience in long-term HRIs; how users perceive the ongoing interactions and the robot’s ability to sustain it over time. Therefore, here we examine the effect of the repeated measures (10 testing sessions) and the discussion theme (Covid-19 related vs general) on the way participants experienced the interaction quality with a social robot and perceived the robot’s communication competency over time. We found that despite individual differences between the participants, over time participants found the interactions with Pepper to be of higher quality and that Pepper’s communication skills got better. Nevertheless, our results also stressed that the discussion theme has no meaningful nor significant effect on the way people perceive Pepper and the interaction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信