硬件仿真与试飞

L. Orlidge
{"title":"硬件仿真与试飞","authors":"L. Orlidge","doi":"10.1109/AUTEST.2000.885580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Confirming mission readiness is the most critical function flightline testers perform. Ideally, pre-night mission readiness assessments would exercise and verify every critical function of the weapon system that could be called upon in battle. No existing flightline test system can provide this level of readiness assessment. So what is wrong with today's testers? First, it is not practical to perform operational end-to-end testing of major subsystems with conventional testers. Second, many testers cannot readily make use of failure data that is available from on-board vehicle health monitoring systems or current testers use hardware intensive architectures-architectures that drive performance versus size, weight, and total ownership cost tradeoffs. How can we change this? Integrating portable maintenance aids (PMAs) and maintenance information systems into the test repertoire can help significantly; however, these solutions do little to augment the information available for system test and diagnosis. Adding conventional test instrumentation under PMA control would provide the additional information we seek, but as cited above, hardware intensive solutions is one of the problems with today's flightline testers. Emulating test instrumentation using virtual instruments (VI) specifically addresses the problems and limitations associated with hardware intensive test systems. This paper will describe the VI concept and Honeywell's two embodiments of VI, and will discuss VI's applicability to flightline test and the next generation automatic test systems.","PeriodicalId":334061,"journal":{"name":"2000 IEEE Autotestcon Proceedings. IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference. Future Sustainment for Military Aerospace (Cat. No.00CH37057)","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hardware emulation and test at the flightline\",\"authors\":\"L. Orlidge\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AUTEST.2000.885580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Confirming mission readiness is the most critical function flightline testers perform. Ideally, pre-night mission readiness assessments would exercise and verify every critical function of the weapon system that could be called upon in battle. No existing flightline test system can provide this level of readiness assessment. So what is wrong with today's testers? First, it is not practical to perform operational end-to-end testing of major subsystems with conventional testers. Second, many testers cannot readily make use of failure data that is available from on-board vehicle health monitoring systems or current testers use hardware intensive architectures-architectures that drive performance versus size, weight, and total ownership cost tradeoffs. How can we change this? Integrating portable maintenance aids (PMAs) and maintenance information systems into the test repertoire can help significantly; however, these solutions do little to augment the information available for system test and diagnosis. Adding conventional test instrumentation under PMA control would provide the additional information we seek, but as cited above, hardware intensive solutions is one of the problems with today's flightline testers. Emulating test instrumentation using virtual instruments (VI) specifically addresses the problems and limitations associated with hardware intensive test systems. This paper will describe the VI concept and Honeywell's two embodiments of VI, and will discuss VI's applicability to flightline test and the next generation automatic test systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":334061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2000 IEEE Autotestcon Proceedings. IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference. Future Sustainment for Military Aerospace (Cat. No.00CH37057)\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2000 IEEE Autotestcon Proceedings. IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference. Future Sustainment for Military Aerospace (Cat. No.00CH37057)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.2000.885580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2000 IEEE Autotestcon Proceedings. IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference. Future Sustainment for Military Aerospace (Cat. No.00CH37057)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.2000.885580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

确认任务准备就绪是飞行测试人员执行的最关键的功能。理想情况下,夜间任务准备评估将演练和验证在战斗中可能用到的武器系统的每一个关键功能。没有现有的飞行测试系统可以提供这种水平的准备评估。那么,今天的测试人员到底出了什么问题?首先,用传统的测试器对主要子系统执行操作端到端测试是不实际的。其次,许多测试人员不能很容易地利用车载健康监测系统提供的故障数据,或者目前的测试人员使用硬件密集型架构——驱动性能与尺寸、重量和总拥有成本权衡的架构。我们怎样才能改变这一点呢?将便携式维修辅助设备(pma)和维修信息系统集成到测试库中会有很大帮助;然而,这些解决方案在增加系统测试和诊断的可用信息方面做得很少。在PMA控制下添加常规测试仪器将提供我们所寻求的额外信息,但如上所述,硬件密集型解决方案是当今飞行线路测试器的问题之一。使用虚拟仪器(VI)仿真测试仪器专门解决了与硬件密集型测试系统相关的问题和限制。本文将介绍VI的概念和霍尼韦尔的两个VI实施例,并将讨论VI在飞行测试和下一代自动测试系统中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hardware emulation and test at the flightline
Confirming mission readiness is the most critical function flightline testers perform. Ideally, pre-night mission readiness assessments would exercise and verify every critical function of the weapon system that could be called upon in battle. No existing flightline test system can provide this level of readiness assessment. So what is wrong with today's testers? First, it is not practical to perform operational end-to-end testing of major subsystems with conventional testers. Second, many testers cannot readily make use of failure data that is available from on-board vehicle health monitoring systems or current testers use hardware intensive architectures-architectures that drive performance versus size, weight, and total ownership cost tradeoffs. How can we change this? Integrating portable maintenance aids (PMAs) and maintenance information systems into the test repertoire can help significantly; however, these solutions do little to augment the information available for system test and diagnosis. Adding conventional test instrumentation under PMA control would provide the additional information we seek, but as cited above, hardware intensive solutions is one of the problems with today's flightline testers. Emulating test instrumentation using virtual instruments (VI) specifically addresses the problems and limitations associated with hardware intensive test systems. This paper will describe the VI concept and Honeywell's two embodiments of VI, and will discuss VI's applicability to flightline test and the next generation automatic test systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信