神圣的惩罚,“最后的圣战”或新教的起源:阿拉伯和鞑靼穆斯林改革者的书面遗产中的十字军东征(19世纪至20世纪初)

N. Tikhonova, O. Sokolov
{"title":"神圣的惩罚,“最后的圣战”或新教的起源:阿拉伯和鞑靼穆斯林改革者的书面遗产中的十字军东征(19世纪至20世纪初)","authors":"N. Tikhonova, O. Sokolov","doi":"10.31250/1238-5018-2021-27-2-45-52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This case study is a first ever attempt to compare the perceptions of the Crusades that emerged in Arab and Tatar Muslim modernist narratives of the late 19th — early 20th centuries through the discourse analysis of their written legacy. The comparison itself is of particular interest to understand the emergence of early Muslim modernist discourse, influential enough to set the tone for the various ideological concepts among modern Muslims. It is argued in this paper that Arab and Tatar Muslim reformers expressed significant differences in their interpretations of the Crusades period, despite a number of summary explanations can be reviewed in the Muslim modernist discourse under consideration (such as divine punishment, great shock for the umma, etc.). At the same time, the Crusades' concept along with the image of the “Christian — Crusader — Other” became an integral part of Muslim intellectual discourse of the late 19th — early 20th centuries, due to the widespread occurrence of “print capitalism” and actualization of anti colonial narratives among Muslims.","PeriodicalId":236935,"journal":{"name":"Manuscripta Orientalia. International Journal for Oriental Manuscript Research","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Divine Punishment, “the Last Jihad” or the Origin of Protestantism: the Crusades in the Written Legacy of Arab and Tatar Muslim reformers (19th — Early 20th Centuries)\",\"authors\":\"N. Tikhonova, O. Sokolov\",\"doi\":\"10.31250/1238-5018-2021-27-2-45-52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This case study is a first ever attempt to compare the perceptions of the Crusades that emerged in Arab and Tatar Muslim modernist narratives of the late 19th — early 20th centuries through the discourse analysis of their written legacy. The comparison itself is of particular interest to understand the emergence of early Muslim modernist discourse, influential enough to set the tone for the various ideological concepts among modern Muslims. It is argued in this paper that Arab and Tatar Muslim reformers expressed significant differences in their interpretations of the Crusades period, despite a number of summary explanations can be reviewed in the Muslim modernist discourse under consideration (such as divine punishment, great shock for the umma, etc.). At the same time, the Crusades' concept along with the image of the “Christian — Crusader — Other” became an integral part of Muslim intellectual discourse of the late 19th — early 20th centuries, due to the widespread occurrence of “print capitalism” and actualization of anti colonial narratives among Muslims.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manuscripta Orientalia. International Journal for Oriental Manuscript Research\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manuscripta Orientalia. International Journal for Oriental Manuscript Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31250/1238-5018-2021-27-2-45-52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manuscripta Orientalia. International Journal for Oriental Manuscript Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31250/1238-5018-2021-27-2-45-52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本案例研究首次尝试通过对其书面遗产的话语分析,比较19世纪末至20世纪初阿拉伯和鞑靼穆斯林现代主义叙事中出现的十字军东征的看法。这种比较本身对于理解早期穆斯林现代主义话语的出现特别有意义,这些话语的影响力足以为现代穆斯林的各种意识形态概念奠定基调。本文认为,阿拉伯和鞑靼穆斯林改革者对十字军东征时期的解释存在显著差异,尽管在考虑中的穆斯林现代主义话语中可以回顾一些总结解释(如神的惩罚、乌玛的大震动等)。与此同时,由于“印刷资本主义”的广泛出现和穆斯林反殖民叙事的实现,十字军东征的概念以及“基督教-十字军-他者”的形象成为19世纪末至20世纪初穆斯林知识话语中不可或缺的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Divine Punishment, “the Last Jihad” or the Origin of Protestantism: the Crusades in the Written Legacy of Arab and Tatar Muslim reformers (19th — Early 20th Centuries)
This case study is a first ever attempt to compare the perceptions of the Crusades that emerged in Arab and Tatar Muslim modernist narratives of the late 19th — early 20th centuries through the discourse analysis of their written legacy. The comparison itself is of particular interest to understand the emergence of early Muslim modernist discourse, influential enough to set the tone for the various ideological concepts among modern Muslims. It is argued in this paper that Arab and Tatar Muslim reformers expressed significant differences in their interpretations of the Crusades period, despite a number of summary explanations can be reviewed in the Muslim modernist discourse under consideration (such as divine punishment, great shock for the umma, etc.). At the same time, the Crusades' concept along with the image of the “Christian — Crusader — Other” became an integral part of Muslim intellectual discourse of the late 19th — early 20th centuries, due to the widespread occurrence of “print capitalism” and actualization of anti colonial narratives among Muslims.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信