{"title":"论埃及仲裁法中对仲裁员的质疑程序的强制性及对仲裁机构裁决的上诉能力。《对会议的评论","authors":"D. Hussein","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2016016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Cairo Court of Appeal rendered an important decision regarding an arbitral tribunal’s decision on the challenge of an arbitrator, concluding that the procedures to challenge arbitrators provided for in the Egyptian Arbitration Law are not part of public policy. The Court thus rejected the party’s request to set aside the challenge decision and refused to examine it before the issuance of the final award.","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Consideration of the Procedures to Challenge Arbitrators in the Egyptian Arbitration Law as Mandatory and the Ability to Appeal Decisions Made by Arbitral Institutions. A Commentary on the Cair\",\"authors\":\"D. Hussein\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/bcdr2016016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Cairo Court of Appeal rendered an important decision regarding an arbitral tribunal’s decision on the challenge of an arbitrator, concluding that the procedures to challenge arbitrators provided for in the Egyptian Arbitration Law are not part of public policy. The Court thus rejected the party’s request to set aside the challenge decision and refused to examine it before the issuance of the final award.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BCDR International Arbitration Review\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BCDR International Arbitration Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2016016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2016016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the Consideration of the Procedures to Challenge Arbitrators in the Egyptian Arbitration Law as Mandatory and the Ability to Appeal Decisions Made by Arbitral Institutions. A Commentary on the Cair
The Cairo Court of Appeal rendered an important decision regarding an arbitral tribunal’s decision on the challenge of an arbitrator, concluding that the procedures to challenge arbitrators provided for in the Egyptian Arbitration Law are not part of public policy. The Court thus rejected the party’s request to set aside the challenge decision and refused to examine it before the issuance of the final award.