关于犹太人在16世纪的罗马德意志帝国中改变信仰的地位与想法以19世纪初的传统

Julianna Orsós
{"title":"关于犹太人在16世纪的罗马德意志帝国中改变信仰的地位与想法以19世纪初的传统","authors":"Julianna Orsós","doi":"10.15170/spmnnv.2017.09.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The attitude towards converted Jews is presented through the examples of Johann Pfefferkorn, Victor von Carben and Matthäus Adriani. The similarities and differences in their estimation show the nuances of the contemporary public opinion about the Jews. The paper introduces first of all the different positions of German humanists and the phenomenon how the so-called Battle of Books mirrored the contemporary social attitudes towards Jews and converted Jews.","PeriodicalId":391066,"journal":{"name":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Über die Status und Perzeption der konvertierten Juden in dem Römisch-deutschen Reich des 16. Jahrhunderts im Spiegel des Bücherstreits\",\"authors\":\"Julianna Orsós\",\"doi\":\"10.15170/spmnnv.2017.09.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The attitude towards converted Jews is presented through the examples of Johann Pfefferkorn, Victor von Carben and Matthäus Adriani. The similarities and differences in their estimation show the nuances of the contemporary public opinion about the Jews. The paper introduces first of all the different positions of German humanists and the phenomenon how the so-called Battle of Books mirrored the contemporary social attitudes towards Jews and converted Jews.\",\"PeriodicalId\":391066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2017.09.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2017.09.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过约翰·普费弗科恩、维克多·冯·卡本和Matthäus阿德里亚尼的例子,展示了对皈依犹太人的态度。他们对犹太人的看法的异同表明了当代公众对犹太人看法的细微差别。本文首先介绍了德国人文主义者的不同立场,以及所谓的“书籍之战”如何反映当代社会对犹太人和皈依犹太人的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Über die Status und Perzeption der konvertierten Juden in dem Römisch-deutschen Reich des 16. Jahrhunderts im Spiegel des Bücherstreits
The attitude towards converted Jews is presented through the examples of Johann Pfefferkorn, Victor von Carben and Matthäus Adriani. The similarities and differences in their estimation show the nuances of the contemporary public opinion about the Jews. The paper introduces first of all the different positions of German humanists and the phenomenon how the so-called Battle of Books mirrored the contemporary social attitudes towards Jews and converted Jews.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信