将人为因素量化并整合到检测概率评估中的方法

M. Bertovic, J. Given, V. Rentala, M. Wall, D. Kanzler, J. Lehleitner, T. Heckel, V. Tkachenko
{"title":"将人为因素量化并整合到检测概率评估中的方法","authors":"M. Bertovic, J. Given, V. Rentala, M. Wall, D. Kanzler, J. Lehleitner, T. Heckel, V. Tkachenko","doi":"10.1784/insi.2023.65.7.364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human factors (HFs) are a frequently mentioned topic when talking about the reliability of non-destructive testing (NDT). However, probability of detection (POD), the commonly used measure of NDT reliability, only looks at the technical capability of an NDT system to detect a defect.\n After several decades of research on the influence of HFs on NDT reliability, there is still no commonly accepted approach to rendering HFs visible in reliability assessment. This paper provides an overview of possible quantitative and qualitative methods for integrating HFs into the reliability\n assessment. It is concluded that reliability assessment is best carried out using both quantifiable and non-quantifiable approaches to HFs.","PeriodicalId":344397,"journal":{"name":"Insight - Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods for quantification and integration of human factors into probability of detection assessments\",\"authors\":\"M. Bertovic, J. Given, V. Rentala, M. Wall, D. Kanzler, J. Lehleitner, T. Heckel, V. Tkachenko\",\"doi\":\"10.1784/insi.2023.65.7.364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Human factors (HFs) are a frequently mentioned topic when talking about the reliability of non-destructive testing (NDT). However, probability of detection (POD), the commonly used measure of NDT reliability, only looks at the technical capability of an NDT system to detect a defect.\\n After several decades of research on the influence of HFs on NDT reliability, there is still no commonly accepted approach to rendering HFs visible in reliability assessment. This paper provides an overview of possible quantitative and qualitative methods for integrating HFs into the reliability\\n assessment. It is concluded that reliability assessment is best carried out using both quantifiable and non-quantifiable approaches to HFs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insight - Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insight - Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2023.65.7.364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insight - Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2023.65.7.364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在谈论无损检测(NDT)的可靠性时,人为因素(HFs)是一个经常被提及的话题。然而,检测概率(POD)是无损检测可靠性的常用度量,它只关注无损检测系统检测缺陷的技术能力。经过几十年对高频振荡对无损检测可靠性影响的研究,在可靠性评估中仍然没有普遍接受的方法来显示高频振荡。本文概述了将高频波动纳入可靠性评估的可能的定量和定性方法。结论是,可靠性评估最好同时使用可量化和不可量化的方法来进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methods for quantification and integration of human factors into probability of detection assessments
Human factors (HFs) are a frequently mentioned topic when talking about the reliability of non-destructive testing (NDT). However, probability of detection (POD), the commonly used measure of NDT reliability, only looks at the technical capability of an NDT system to detect a defect. After several decades of research on the influence of HFs on NDT reliability, there is still no commonly accepted approach to rendering HFs visible in reliability assessment. This paper provides an overview of possible quantitative and qualitative methods for integrating HFs into the reliability assessment. It is concluded that reliability assessment is best carried out using both quantifiable and non-quantifiable approaches to HFs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信