{"title":"关于工程师写作的两种刻板印象的调查","authors":"Sharon Kowalski, Nawctsd, Orlando","doi":"10.1109/IPCC.1997.637074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This statistical study makes use of data gathered during quality-control inspections to examine the validity of two commonly held stereotypes. The first of these is the belief that documents containing superficial errors are likely to be flawed in a more substantial manner; the second is that engineers tend to be especially inept as technical writers. In both cases, the data indicate that the stereotypes are invalid.","PeriodicalId":255103,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IPCC 97. Communication","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An investigation of two stereotypes regarding the writing of engineers\",\"authors\":\"Sharon Kowalski, Nawctsd, Orlando\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPCC.1997.637074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This statistical study makes use of data gathered during quality-control inspections to examine the validity of two commonly held stereotypes. The first of these is the belief that documents containing superficial errors are likely to be flawed in a more substantial manner; the second is that engineers tend to be especially inept as technical writers. In both cases, the data indicate that the stereotypes are invalid.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of IPCC 97. Communication\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of IPCC 97. Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.1997.637074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IPCC 97. Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.1997.637074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An investigation of two stereotypes regarding the writing of engineers
This statistical study makes use of data gathered during quality-control inspections to examine the validity of two commonly held stereotypes. The first of these is the belief that documents containing superficial errors are likely to be flawed in a more substantial manner; the second is that engineers tend to be especially inept as technical writers. In both cases, the data indicate that the stereotypes are invalid.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
