统一欧盟司法实践的文书

Manuela Maria NECHITA (cas. PUȘCĂ)
{"title":"统一欧盟司法实践的文书","authors":"Manuela Maria NECHITA (cas. PUȘCĂ)","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2023-1-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concern to ensure uniform judicial practice is a priority for most EU Member States and is reflected in the regulation in national law of numerous and varied mechanisms for unifying case law, some formal or informal, others involving an administrative or contentious procedure. The present research proposes to identify the mechanisms of unification of judicial practice existing at the level of the European Union States and an analysis of them in relation to the institution of the appeal in the interest of the law regulated by the criminal procedural legislation of our country. At the same time, we consider the following methodological means: literature review, comparative and epistemological method.","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instruments for unifying judicial practice in the European Union\",\"authors\":\"Manuela Maria NECHITA (cas. PUȘCĂ)\",\"doi\":\"10.47743/rdc-2023-1-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concern to ensure uniform judicial practice is a priority for most EU Member States and is reflected in the regulation in national law of numerous and varied mechanisms for unifying case law, some formal or informal, others involving an administrative or contentious procedure. The present research proposes to identify the mechanisms of unification of judicial practice existing at the level of the European Union States and an analysis of them in relation to the institution of the appeal in the interest of the law regulated by the criminal procedural legislation of our country. At the same time, we consider the following methodological means: literature review, comparative and epistemological method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":421528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Drept Constituțional\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Drept Constituțional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2023-1-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2023-1-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确保统一司法实践的关切是大多数欧盟成员国的优先事项,这反映在国内法中关于统一判例法的许多不同机制的规定中,有些是正式的或非正式的,有些则涉及行政程序或争议程序。本研究旨在识别欧盟层面存在的司法实践统一机制,并结合我国刑事诉讼立法所规范的法律利益申诉制度对其进行分析。同时,我们考虑了以下方法论手段:文献法、比较法和认识论法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Instruments for unifying judicial practice in the European Union
The concern to ensure uniform judicial practice is a priority for most EU Member States and is reflected in the regulation in national law of numerous and varied mechanisms for unifying case law, some formal or informal, others involving an administrative or contentious procedure. The present research proposes to identify the mechanisms of unification of judicial practice existing at the level of the European Union States and an analysis of them in relation to the institution of the appeal in the interest of the law regulated by the criminal procedural legislation of our country. At the same time, we consider the following methodological means: literature review, comparative and epistemological method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信