{"title":"对澳大利亚五岁儿童的语言筛选效能","authors":"D. James","doi":"10.3109/ASL2.1994.22.ISSUE-2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A group of 282 Australian five-year-old children were screened for language impairment with a battery of tests that included a sentence repetition test and appraisal of receptive and expressive language, in single sentences and discourse, in monologue and dialogue. The failure rates for each test, or test components, varied from 12.2% to 51.6%. The failure rates were recalculated using the norms from the sample data and all approximated 13%. The validity of using some of the tests on an Australian population was questioned.","PeriodicalId":426731,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of human communication disorders","volume":"2011 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy of a Language Screening Battery for Australian Five-Year-Old Children\",\"authors\":\"D. James\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/ASL2.1994.22.ISSUE-2.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A group of 282 Australian five-year-old children were screened for language impairment with a battery of tests that included a sentence repetition test and appraisal of receptive and expressive language, in single sentences and discourse, in monologue and dialogue. The failure rates for each test, or test components, varied from 12.2% to 51.6%. The failure rates were recalculated using the norms from the sample data and all approximated 13%. The validity of using some of the tests on an Australian population was questioned.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian journal of human communication disorders\",\"volume\":\"2011 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian journal of human communication disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/ASL2.1994.22.ISSUE-2.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of human communication disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/ASL2.1994.22.ISSUE-2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Efficacy of a Language Screening Battery for Australian Five-Year-Old Children
A group of 282 Australian five-year-old children were screened for language impairment with a battery of tests that included a sentence repetition test and appraisal of receptive and expressive language, in single sentences and discourse, in monologue and dialogue. The failure rates for each test, or test components, varied from 12.2% to 51.6%. The failure rates were recalculated using the norms from the sample data and all approximated 13%. The validity of using some of the tests on an Australian population was questioned.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
