职前教师写作习惯显性教学的效果

L. Sharp
{"title":"职前教师写作习惯显性教学的效果","authors":"L. Sharp","doi":"10.56887/galiteracy.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preservice teachers require both personal knowledge and pedagogical understandings with written conventions. Concern with preservice teachers’ inability to demonstrate proficiency with written conventions prompted this study. This study utilized a pretest/posttest design, and participants’ were preservice teachers enrolled in a teacher education program. Participants completed five professor-created lessons aimed to develop personal knowledge with written conventions. Findings showed statistical significance regarding participants’ personal knowledge after receiving explicit instruction with written conventions. ","PeriodicalId":111992,"journal":{"name":"Georgia Journal of Literacy","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Explicit Instruction with Writing Conventions Among Preservice Teachers\",\"authors\":\"L. Sharp\",\"doi\":\"10.56887/galiteracy.32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Preservice teachers require both personal knowledge and pedagogical understandings with written conventions. Concern with preservice teachers’ inability to demonstrate proficiency with written conventions prompted this study. This study utilized a pretest/posttest design, and participants’ were preservice teachers enrolled in a teacher education program. Participants completed five professor-created lessons aimed to develop personal knowledge with written conventions. Findings showed statistical significance regarding participants’ personal knowledge after receiving explicit instruction with written conventions. \",\"PeriodicalId\":111992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Georgia Journal of Literacy\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Georgia Journal of Literacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56887/galiteracy.32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgia Journal of Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56887/galiteracy.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

职前教师既需要个人知识,也需要对书面惯例的教学理解。对职前教师无法熟练运用书面惯例的关注促使了这项研究。本研究采用前测/后测设计,参与者为参加教师教育计划的职前教师。参与者完成了五门由教授设计的课程,旨在培养个人对书面惯例的了解。研究结果显示,在接受书面约定的明确指导后,参与者的个人知识有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Explicit Instruction with Writing Conventions Among Preservice Teachers
Preservice teachers require both personal knowledge and pedagogical understandings with written conventions. Concern with preservice teachers’ inability to demonstrate proficiency with written conventions prompted this study. This study utilized a pretest/posttest design, and participants’ were preservice teachers enrolled in a teacher education program. Participants completed five professor-created lessons aimed to develop personal knowledge with written conventions. Findings showed statistical significance regarding participants’ personal knowledge after receiving explicit instruction with written conventions. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信