{"title":"心理学家在巴基斯坦法庭刑事案件中的专家证人","authors":"Ali Ajmal, Bushra Nasim, Faiza Rasool","doi":"10.31703/gsr.2022(vii-iv).06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the role of psychologists as expert witnesses and its evidentiary value in the criminal matters in the courts in Pakistan. Under article 59 of Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order 1984, a psychologist can be an expert and his expert opinion is admissible in the court subject to the criteria laid down by this article. The scope of this paper is limited to the expert witness and expert opinion of psychologists in the form of evidence in criminal matters in the courts in Pakistan. The courts in Pakistan consider the testimony of psychologists as admissible when relevant. However, the probative value of the evidence presented by a psychologist depends upon his relevant qualification and the psychological methods applied in a particular case. The findings of this article have implications for psychologists, psychiatrists, jurists, judges, and lawyers.","PeriodicalId":305544,"journal":{"name":"Global Sociological Review","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychologists as Expert Witnesses in Criminal Matters in Courts in Pakistan\",\"authors\":\"Ali Ajmal, Bushra Nasim, Faiza Rasool\",\"doi\":\"10.31703/gsr.2022(vii-iv).06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyzes the role of psychologists as expert witnesses and its evidentiary value in the criminal matters in the courts in Pakistan. Under article 59 of Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order 1984, a psychologist can be an expert and his expert opinion is admissible in the court subject to the criteria laid down by this article. The scope of this paper is limited to the expert witness and expert opinion of psychologists in the form of evidence in criminal matters in the courts in Pakistan. The courts in Pakistan consider the testimony of psychologists as admissible when relevant. However, the probative value of the evidence presented by a psychologist depends upon his relevant qualification and the psychological methods applied in a particular case. The findings of this article have implications for psychologists, psychiatrists, jurists, judges, and lawyers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Sociological Review\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Sociological Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2022(vii-iv).06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2022(vii-iv).06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Psychologists as Expert Witnesses in Criminal Matters in Courts in Pakistan
This paper analyzes the role of psychologists as expert witnesses and its evidentiary value in the criminal matters in the courts in Pakistan. Under article 59 of Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order 1984, a psychologist can be an expert and his expert opinion is admissible in the court subject to the criteria laid down by this article. The scope of this paper is limited to the expert witness and expert opinion of psychologists in the form of evidence in criminal matters in the courts in Pakistan. The courts in Pakistan consider the testimony of psychologists as admissible when relevant. However, the probative value of the evidence presented by a psychologist depends upon his relevant qualification and the psychological methods applied in a particular case. The findings of this article have implications for psychologists, psychiatrists, jurists, judges, and lawyers.