{"title":"声音里有什么?瑞秋·库什纳的《火星屋》中的叙事实例量化","authors":"Serena Demichelis","doi":"10.28914/atlantis-2023-45.1.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims at reconsidering aspects raised by criticism of Rachel Kushner’s The Mars Room (2018). While almost universally praised for its contents, the novel has been met with a more diverse response as far as its stylistic and narrative structures are concerned. By adopting a double methodology, grounded in traditional close reading and quantitative tools derived from corpus stylistics, this analysis addresses the issue of voice and perspective in Kushner’s novel in order to show how ultimately traditional their use is. These findings thus clash with previous views on The Mars Room, and they confirm the more aprioristically identifiable impact certain narratological features (such as focalization) tend to have on style when compared to broader notions like that of voice, which intrinsically involves a broader ‘field of action’ and is thus more problematic when it comes to quantification.","PeriodicalId":172515,"journal":{"name":"Atlantis. Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American Studies","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What’s in a voice? Quantifying the Narrating Instance in Rachel Kushner’s The Mars Room\",\"authors\":\"Serena Demichelis\",\"doi\":\"10.28914/atlantis-2023-45.1.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims at reconsidering aspects raised by criticism of Rachel Kushner’s The Mars Room (2018). While almost universally praised for its contents, the novel has been met with a more diverse response as far as its stylistic and narrative structures are concerned. By adopting a double methodology, grounded in traditional close reading and quantitative tools derived from corpus stylistics, this analysis addresses the issue of voice and perspective in Kushner’s novel in order to show how ultimately traditional their use is. These findings thus clash with previous views on The Mars Room, and they confirm the more aprioristically identifiable impact certain narratological features (such as focalization) tend to have on style when compared to broader notions like that of voice, which intrinsically involves a broader ‘field of action’ and is thus more problematic when it comes to quantification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":172515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atlantis. Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American Studies\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atlantis. Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28914/atlantis-2023-45.1.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atlantis. Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28914/atlantis-2023-45.1.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文旨在重新考虑瑞秋·库什纳(Rachel Kushner)的《火星屋》(The Mars Room, 2018)所受到的批评。尽管小说内容广受好评,但就其风格和叙事结构而言,人们对它的反应却更为多样化。本文采用基于传统细读和语料库文体学衍生的定量工具的双重分析方法,解决了库什纳小说中声音和视角的问题,以显示它们的使用最终是多么传统。因此,这些发现与之前关于《火星屋》的观点相冲突,它们证实了与声音等更广泛的概念(本质上涉及更广泛的“行动领域”)相比,某些叙事特征(如聚焦)倾向于对风格产生更先验可识别的影响,因此在量化时更有问题。
What’s in a voice? Quantifying the Narrating Instance in Rachel Kushner’s The Mars Room
This paper aims at reconsidering aspects raised by criticism of Rachel Kushner’s The Mars Room (2018). While almost universally praised for its contents, the novel has been met with a more diverse response as far as its stylistic and narrative structures are concerned. By adopting a double methodology, grounded in traditional close reading and quantitative tools derived from corpus stylistics, this analysis addresses the issue of voice and perspective in Kushner’s novel in order to show how ultimately traditional their use is. These findings thus clash with previous views on The Mars Room, and they confirm the more aprioristically identifiable impact certain narratological features (such as focalization) tend to have on style when compared to broader notions like that of voice, which intrinsically involves a broader ‘field of action’ and is thus more problematic when it comes to quantification.