1999年《纽约时报》第40条关于新闻界作为莱克斯专家的争议

Saiful Amri, P. Maulina, Alifuddin Zuhri
{"title":"1999年《纽约时报》第40条关于新闻界作为莱克斯专家的争议","authors":"Saiful Amri, P. Maulina, Alifuddin Zuhri","doi":"10.35308/SOURCE.V7I1.3521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aims of this study is to examine how the pros and cons of Law Number 40 of 1999 concerning the Press as a lex specialis from a legal point of view. This research is a descriptive qualitative study with a literature review approach, which focuses on discussing the substance of the law and the issues under study in accordance with the relevant literature. The results of the study illustrate that there are pros and cons related to the position of the Law. No.40 of 1999 concerning the press as lex specialis. The pro side illustrates that press activities and various disputes that arise in it when referring to the press law that has been specially formulated is used to solve press problems specifically, so that it is considered a lex specialis. On the other hand, it emphasizes that the press law from various sides does not meet the requirements as a lex specialis because there is no clear legal basis for reference from any parent law.","PeriodicalId":148767,"journal":{"name":"SOURCE : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PRO DAN KONTRA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERS SEBAGAI LEX SPECIALIS ( Memaksimalkan Profesionalitas Pers dalam Menjalankan Aktifitas Jurnalistik )\",\"authors\":\"Saiful Amri, P. Maulina, Alifuddin Zuhri\",\"doi\":\"10.35308/SOURCE.V7I1.3521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aims of this study is to examine how the pros and cons of Law Number 40 of 1999 concerning the Press as a lex specialis from a legal point of view. This research is a descriptive qualitative study with a literature review approach, which focuses on discussing the substance of the law and the issues under study in accordance with the relevant literature. The results of the study illustrate that there are pros and cons related to the position of the Law. No.40 of 1999 concerning the press as lex specialis. The pro side illustrates that press activities and various disputes that arise in it when referring to the press law that has been specially formulated is used to solve press problems specifically, so that it is considered a lex specialis. On the other hand, it emphasizes that the press law from various sides does not meet the requirements as a lex specialis because there is no clear legal basis for reference from any parent law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SOURCE : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SOURCE : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35308/SOURCE.V7I1.3521\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOURCE : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35308/SOURCE.V7I1.3521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是从法律的角度研究1999年第40号法关于新闻界作为特别法的利弊。本研究采用文献综述的描述性定性研究方法,重点根据相关文献探讨法律的实质和研究问题。研究结果表明,法律的立场有利有弊。1999年第40号,关于新闻界的专业法律。有利的一面说明,在专门制定的新闻法中,新闻活动及其产生的各种纠纷是专门用来解决新闻问题的,因此它被认为是特别法。另一方面,强调各方面的新闻法不符合特别法的要求,因为没有明确的法律依据可供任何成文法参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PRO DAN KONTRA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERS SEBAGAI LEX SPECIALIS ( Memaksimalkan Profesionalitas Pers dalam Menjalankan Aktifitas Jurnalistik )
The aims of this study is to examine how the pros and cons of Law Number 40 of 1999 concerning the Press as a lex specialis from a legal point of view. This research is a descriptive qualitative study with a literature review approach, which focuses on discussing the substance of the law and the issues under study in accordance with the relevant literature. The results of the study illustrate that there are pros and cons related to the position of the Law. No.40 of 1999 concerning the press as lex specialis. The pro side illustrates that press activities and various disputes that arise in it when referring to the press law that has been specially formulated is used to solve press problems specifically, so that it is considered a lex specialis. On the other hand, it emphasizes that the press law from various sides does not meet the requirements as a lex specialis because there is no clear legal basis for reference from any parent law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信