基于覆盖率的测试工具的调查

Qian Yang, Juan Li, D. Weiss
{"title":"基于覆盖率的测试工具的调查","authors":"Qian Yang, Juan Li, D. Weiss","doi":"10.1145/1138929.1138949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Test coverage is sometimes used as a way to measure how thoroughly software is tested. Coverage is used by software developers and sometimes by vendors to indicate their confidence in the readiness of their software. This survey studies and compares 17 coverage-based testing tools focusing on, but not restricted to coverage measurement. We also survey additional features, including program prioritization for testing, assistance in debugging, automatic generation of test cases, and customization of test reports. Such features make tools more useful and practical, especially for large-scale, real-life commercial software applications. Our initial motivations were both to understand the available test coverage tools and to compare them to a tool that we have developed, called eXVantage1 (a tool suite that includes code coverage testing, debugging, performance profiling, and reporting). Our study shows that each tool has its unique features tailored to its application domains. Therefore this study can be used to pick the right coverage testing tools depending on various requirements.","PeriodicalId":443108,"journal":{"name":"International Conference/Workshop on Automation of Software Test","volume":"257 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"166","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of coverage based testing tools\",\"authors\":\"Qian Yang, Juan Li, D. Weiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1138929.1138949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Test coverage is sometimes used as a way to measure how thoroughly software is tested. Coverage is used by software developers and sometimes by vendors to indicate their confidence in the readiness of their software. This survey studies and compares 17 coverage-based testing tools focusing on, but not restricted to coverage measurement. We also survey additional features, including program prioritization for testing, assistance in debugging, automatic generation of test cases, and customization of test reports. Such features make tools more useful and practical, especially for large-scale, real-life commercial software applications. Our initial motivations were both to understand the available test coverage tools and to compare them to a tool that we have developed, called eXVantage1 (a tool suite that includes code coverage testing, debugging, performance profiling, and reporting). Our study shows that each tool has its unique features tailored to its application domains. Therefore this study can be used to pick the right coverage testing tools depending on various requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference/Workshop on Automation of Software Test\",\"volume\":\"257 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"166\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference/Workshop on Automation of Software Test\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1138929.1138949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference/Workshop on Automation of Software Test","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1138929.1138949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 166

摘要

测试覆盖率有时被用作衡量软件测试的彻底程度的一种方法。覆盖被软件开发人员使用,有时也被供应商使用,以表明他们对软件准备就绪的信心。这个调查研究并比较了17种基于覆盖的测试工具,这些工具关注于但不局限于覆盖度量。我们还调查了额外的特性,包括测试的程序优先级,调试的辅助,测试用例的自动生成,以及测试报告的定制。这些特性使得工具更加有用和实用,特别是对于大规模的、真实的商业软件应用程序。我们最初的动机是了解可用的测试覆盖工具,并将它们与我们开发的工具进行比较,称为eXVantage1(一个包含代码覆盖测试、调试、性能分析和报告的工具套件)。我们的研究表明,每个工具都有适合其应用领域的独特特性。因此,本研究可以用于根据不同的需求选择正确的覆盖率测试工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A survey of coverage based testing tools
Test coverage is sometimes used as a way to measure how thoroughly software is tested. Coverage is used by software developers and sometimes by vendors to indicate their confidence in the readiness of their software. This survey studies and compares 17 coverage-based testing tools focusing on, but not restricted to coverage measurement. We also survey additional features, including program prioritization for testing, assistance in debugging, automatic generation of test cases, and customization of test reports. Such features make tools more useful and practical, especially for large-scale, real-life commercial software applications. Our initial motivations were both to understand the available test coverage tools and to compare them to a tool that we have developed, called eXVantage1 (a tool suite that includes code coverage testing, debugging, performance profiling, and reporting). Our study shows that each tool has its unique features tailored to its application domains. Therefore this study can be used to pick the right coverage testing tools depending on various requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信