触觉感知中力JND与刚度JND的关系

W. Fu, R. Paassen, M. Mulder
{"title":"触觉感知中力JND与刚度JND的关系","authors":"W. Fu, R. Paassen, M. Mulder","doi":"10.1145/3119881.3119882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A large variation of the haptic Just Noticeable difference (JND) in stiffness is found in literature. But no underlying model that explains this variation was found, limiting the practical use of the stiffness JND in the evaluation work of control loading system (CLS). To this end, we investigated the cause of this variation from humans' strategy for stiffness discrimination, by two experiments in which a configurable manipulator was used to generate an elastic force proportional to its angular displacement (deflection). In a first experiment, the stiffness JND was measured for three stiffness levels, and an invariant Weber fraction was obtained. We found that for stiffness discrimination, subjects reproduced the same amount of the manipulator deflection and used the difference in the terminal forces as the indication of the stiffness difference. We demonstrated that the stiffness Weber fraction and the force Weber fraction could be related by a systematic bias in the deflection reproduction, which was caused by the difference in the manipulator stiffness. A second experiment with two conditions was done to verify this model. In one condition, we measured the stiffness JND while asking subjects to move the manipulator to a target angular displacement. Thus the bias in the deflection reproduction was eliminated, and this resulted a stiffness Weber fraction that equaled the force Weber fraction. In the other condition, the stiffness JND was measured without the deflection target, and a bias in deflection reproduction was again observed. This bias related the measurements for the two conditions by the formulation obtained from the first experiment. This suggests that the accuracy of reproducing the manipulator position for stiffness discrimination, which may be susceptible to experimental setting, can be used to explain the variation of stiffness JND in literature. Suggestions are given for CLS evaluation and applications requiring precise manipulator motion control.","PeriodicalId":102213,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the relationship between the force JND and the stiffness JND in haptic perception\",\"authors\":\"W. Fu, R. Paassen, M. Mulder\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3119881.3119882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A large variation of the haptic Just Noticeable difference (JND) in stiffness is found in literature. But no underlying model that explains this variation was found, limiting the practical use of the stiffness JND in the evaluation work of control loading system (CLS). To this end, we investigated the cause of this variation from humans' strategy for stiffness discrimination, by two experiments in which a configurable manipulator was used to generate an elastic force proportional to its angular displacement (deflection). In a first experiment, the stiffness JND was measured for three stiffness levels, and an invariant Weber fraction was obtained. We found that for stiffness discrimination, subjects reproduced the same amount of the manipulator deflection and used the difference in the terminal forces as the indication of the stiffness difference. We demonstrated that the stiffness Weber fraction and the force Weber fraction could be related by a systematic bias in the deflection reproduction, which was caused by the difference in the manipulator stiffness. A second experiment with two conditions was done to verify this model. In one condition, we measured the stiffness JND while asking subjects to move the manipulator to a target angular displacement. Thus the bias in the deflection reproduction was eliminated, and this resulted a stiffness Weber fraction that equaled the force Weber fraction. In the other condition, the stiffness JND was measured without the deflection target, and a bias in deflection reproduction was again observed. This bias related the measurements for the two conditions by the formulation obtained from the first experiment. This suggests that the accuracy of reproducing the manipulator position for stiffness discrimination, which may be susceptible to experimental setting, can be used to explain the variation of stiffness JND in literature. Suggestions are given for CLS evaluation and applications requiring precise manipulator motion control.\",\"PeriodicalId\":102213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3119881.3119882\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3119881.3119882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在文献中发现了一个很大的变化触觉刚明显差异(JND)的刚度。但是没有找到解释这种变化的基础模型,限制了刚度JND在控制加载系统(CLS)评估工作中的实际应用。为此,我们从人类的刚度判别策略中研究了这种变化的原因,通过两个实验,其中一个可配置的机械手被用来产生与其角位移(挠度)成比例的弹性力。在第一次实验中,测量了三个刚度水平下的刚度JND,得到了一个不变的Weber分数。我们发现,对于刚度判别,受试者再现相同数量的机械臂挠度,并使用末端力的差异作为刚度差异的指示。我们证明了刚度韦伯分数和力韦伯分数可以通过挠度再现中的系统偏差联系起来,这是由机械手刚度的差异引起的。在两个条件下进行了第二次实验来验证该模型。在一种情况下,我们测量了刚度JND,同时要求受试者将机械手移动到目标角位移。因此,偏差在挠度再现被消除,这导致刚度韦伯分数等于力韦伯分数。在另一种情况下,在没有挠度目标的情况下测量刚度JND,再次观察到挠度再现的偏差。这种偏差通过从第一个实验中得到的公式将两种条件下的测量结果联系起来。这表明,可以用再现机械手位置的精度来解释文献中刚度JND的变化,这可能受实验设置的影响。对CLS的评价和需要精确机械手运动控制的应用提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the relationship between the force JND and the stiffness JND in haptic perception
A large variation of the haptic Just Noticeable difference (JND) in stiffness is found in literature. But no underlying model that explains this variation was found, limiting the practical use of the stiffness JND in the evaluation work of control loading system (CLS). To this end, we investigated the cause of this variation from humans' strategy for stiffness discrimination, by two experiments in which a configurable manipulator was used to generate an elastic force proportional to its angular displacement (deflection). In a first experiment, the stiffness JND was measured for three stiffness levels, and an invariant Weber fraction was obtained. We found that for stiffness discrimination, subjects reproduced the same amount of the manipulator deflection and used the difference in the terminal forces as the indication of the stiffness difference. We demonstrated that the stiffness Weber fraction and the force Weber fraction could be related by a systematic bias in the deflection reproduction, which was caused by the difference in the manipulator stiffness. A second experiment with two conditions was done to verify this model. In one condition, we measured the stiffness JND while asking subjects to move the manipulator to a target angular displacement. Thus the bias in the deflection reproduction was eliminated, and this resulted a stiffness Weber fraction that equaled the force Weber fraction. In the other condition, the stiffness JND was measured without the deflection target, and a bias in deflection reproduction was again observed. This bias related the measurements for the two conditions by the formulation obtained from the first experiment. This suggests that the accuracy of reproducing the manipulator position for stiffness discrimination, which may be susceptible to experimental setting, can be used to explain the variation of stiffness JND in literature. Suggestions are given for CLS evaluation and applications requiring precise manipulator motion control.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信