新西兰的意识形态和劳资关系

J. Deeks
{"title":"新西兰的意识形态和劳资关系","authors":"J. Deeks","doi":"10.26686/NZJIR.V1I2.2113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is a truism that there is in New Zealand culture a widespread if inarticulate suspicion of ideas, of theory, of ideology and a general preference for the practically useful, for the matter-of-fact treatment of things, for the pragmatic. While the polarisation of theory and practice is not a logically sustainable one — pragmatism after all is based on some theory, some system or principle purporting to explain or predict relationships between events — nevertheless it has in New Zealand a strong emotive appeal that can be used to stigmatise those who profess a particular ideology or who dabble in the ‘unreal’ world of ideas.","PeriodicalId":365392,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand journal of industrial relations","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ideology and Industrial Relations in New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"J. Deeks\",\"doi\":\"10.26686/NZJIR.V1I2.2113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is a truism that there is in New Zealand culture a widespread if inarticulate suspicion of ideas, of theory, of ideology and a general preference for the practically useful, for the matter-of-fact treatment of things, for the pragmatic. While the polarisation of theory and practice is not a logically sustainable one — pragmatism after all is based on some theory, some system or principle purporting to explain or predict relationships between events — nevertheless it has in New Zealand a strong emotive appeal that can be used to stigmatise those who profess a particular ideology or who dabble in the ‘unreal’ world of ideas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand journal of industrial relations\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1976-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand journal of industrial relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26686/NZJIR.V1I2.2113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand journal of industrial relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/NZJIR.V1I2.2113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

不言而喻的是,新西兰文化中普遍存在着一种对思想、理论和意识形态的怀疑,尽管这种怀疑是难以言喻的,而且普遍偏爱实际有用的东西,喜欢实事求是地对待事物,喜欢务实。虽然理论和实践的两极分化在逻辑上是不可持续的——实用主义毕竟是建立在一些理论、一些系统或原则的基础上,这些理论、系统或原则旨在解释或预测事件之间的关系——然而,它在新西兰具有强烈的情感吸引力,可以用来诋毁那些宣称某种特定意识形态或涉足“虚幻”思想世界的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ideology and Industrial Relations in New Zealand
It is a truism that there is in New Zealand culture a widespread if inarticulate suspicion of ideas, of theory, of ideology and a general preference for the practically useful, for the matter-of-fact treatment of things, for the pragmatic. While the polarisation of theory and practice is not a logically sustainable one — pragmatism after all is based on some theory, some system or principle purporting to explain or predict relationships between events — nevertheless it has in New Zealand a strong emotive appeal that can be used to stigmatise those who profess a particular ideology or who dabble in the ‘unreal’ world of ideas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信