PPSA的书写要求及其在完善担保利益竞争中的优先性

C. Walsh
{"title":"PPSA的书写要求及其在完善担保利益竞争中的优先性","authors":"C. Walsh","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2732728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The writing requirement for non-possessory security interests has been a feature of PPSA legislation in common law Canada from its beginnings. For a non-possessory security interest to attach and become enforceable as against third parties, the debtor must have signed a secu- rity agreement containing a description of the collateral, l After several decades of judicial and scholarly scrutiny, the impact of the writing requirement ought to have been settled. However, in the second edition of their excellent handbooks on the Alberta and British Columbia Personal property Security Acts. Professors Cuming and Wood attribute a priority effect to the requirement which many observers are likely to find surprising. The comment shall take issue with the approach they advocate. The debate, however, raises the larger question of the function of a writing requirement for security agreements in a registry system which does not require registration of the security agreement but simply notice of the security interest created by the agreement. The conclusory portion of the comment will address this larger question.","PeriodicalId":129207,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The PPSA Writing Requirement and Priority Among Competing Perfected Security Interests\",\"authors\":\"C. Walsh\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2732728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The writing requirement for non-possessory security interests has been a feature of PPSA legislation in common law Canada from its beginnings. For a non-possessory security interest to attach and become enforceable as against third parties, the debtor must have signed a secu- rity agreement containing a description of the collateral, l After several decades of judicial and scholarly scrutiny, the impact of the writing requirement ought to have been settled. However, in the second edition of their excellent handbooks on the Alberta and British Columbia Personal property Security Acts. Professors Cuming and Wood attribute a priority effect to the requirement which many observers are likely to find surprising. The comment shall take issue with the approach they advocate. The debate, however, raises the larger question of the function of a writing requirement for security agreements in a registry system which does not require registration of the security agreement but simply notice of the security interest created by the agreement. The conclusory portion of the comment will address this larger question.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2732728\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law - Contracts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2732728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非占有担保权益的书面要求从一开始就是加拿大普通法中PPSA立法的一个特点。对于非占有权担保利益的附加和对第三方的强制执行,债务人必须签署一份包含抵押品描述的担保协议。经过几十年的司法和学术审查,书面要求的影响应该已经解决。然而,在他们的第二版优秀手册对阿尔伯塔省和不列颠哥伦比亚省的个人财产安全法案。卡明教授和伍德教授将优先效应归因于许多观察者可能会感到惊讶的要求。评论应该对他们所提倡的方法提出异议。然而,这场辩论提出了一个更大的问题,即在不要求对担保协议进行登记,而仅仅要求对协议所产生的担保利益进行通知的登记制度中,担保协议的书面要求的功能。评论的结论部分将解决这个更大的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The PPSA Writing Requirement and Priority Among Competing Perfected Security Interests
The writing requirement for non-possessory security interests has been a feature of PPSA legislation in common law Canada from its beginnings. For a non-possessory security interest to attach and become enforceable as against third parties, the debtor must have signed a secu- rity agreement containing a description of the collateral, l After several decades of judicial and scholarly scrutiny, the impact of the writing requirement ought to have been settled. However, in the second edition of their excellent handbooks on the Alberta and British Columbia Personal property Security Acts. Professors Cuming and Wood attribute a priority effect to the requirement which many observers are likely to find surprising. The comment shall take issue with the approach they advocate. The debate, however, raises the larger question of the function of a writing requirement for security agreements in a registry system which does not require registration of the security agreement but simply notice of the security interest created by the agreement. The conclusory portion of the comment will address this larger question.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信