{"title":"女巫小说:反对文学?","authors":"L. Giavarini","doi":"10.4000/DOSSIERSGRIHL.6864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I analyze the meaning given by Certeau to \"fiction\" when he speaks about the work of historian ; then I confront this analysis with two possible examples of certalian fiction. This approach allows to clearly distinguish \"fiction\" from \"literature\", and to reflect on extensions concerning the historiographical work of the 17th-century literature.","PeriodicalId":266913,"journal":{"name":"Michel de Certeau et la littérature","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La fiction-sorcière : contre la littérature ?\",\"authors\":\"L. Giavarini\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/DOSSIERSGRIHL.6864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I analyze the meaning given by Certeau to \\\"fiction\\\" when he speaks about the work of historian ; then I confront this analysis with two possible examples of certalian fiction. This approach allows to clearly distinguish \\\"fiction\\\" from \\\"literature\\\", and to reflect on extensions concerning the historiographical work of the 17th-century literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":266913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Michel de Certeau et la littérature\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Michel de Certeau et la littérature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/DOSSIERSGRIHL.6864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michel de Certeau et la littérature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/DOSSIERSGRIHL.6864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this paper, I analyze the meaning given by Certeau to "fiction" when he speaks about the work of historian ; then I confront this analysis with two possible examples of certalian fiction. This approach allows to clearly distinguish "fiction" from "literature", and to reflect on extensions concerning the historiographical work of the 17th-century literature.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
